RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Health and economic outcomes of newborn screening for infantile-onset Pompe disease
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.28.20080606
DO 10.1101/2020.04.28.20080606
A1 John S. Richardson
A1 Alex R. Kemper
A1 Scott D. Grosse
A1 Wendy K.K. Lam
A1 Angela M. Rose
A1 Ayesha Ahmad
A1 Achamyeleh Gebremariam
A1 Lisa A. Prosser
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/03/2020.04.28.20080606.abstract
AB Purpose To estimate health and economic outcomes associated with NBS for infantile-onset Pompe disease in the United States.Methods A decision analytic microsimulation model simulated health and economic outcomes of a birth cohort of 4 million children in the United States. Universal NBS and treatment was compared to clinical identification and treatment of infantile-onset Pompe disease. Main outcomes were projected cases identified, costs, quality adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) over the life course.Results Universal NBS for Pompe disease and confirmatory testing was estimated to cost an additional $26 million annually. Additional medication costs associated with earlier treatment initiation were $181 million; however, $8 million in medical care costs for other services were averted due to delayed disease progression. Infants with screened and treated infantile-onset Pompe disease experienced an average lifetime increase of 11.66 QALYs compared to clinical detection. The ICER was $408,000/QALY from the health care perspective and $379,000/QALY from a societal perspective. Results were sensitive to the cost of enzyme replacement therapy.Conclusions Newborn screening for Pompe disease results in substantial health gains for individuals with infantile-onset Pompe disease, but with additional costs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFinancial support for this study was provided by a grant from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, R01 HS020644. The funding agreement ensured the authors independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not regulatedAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe manuscript and supplementary materials are designed to provide sufficient information for an interested reader to replicate the analysis. The statistical code is available by request from Dr. Prosser lisapros{at}umich.edu.