RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Advanced neurological recovery translates into greater long-term functional independence after acute spinal cord injury
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.01.20185413
DO 10.1101/2020.09.01.20185413
A1 Navid Khosravi-Hashemi
A1 Rainer Abel
A1 Lukas Grassner
A1 Yorck-Bernhard Kalke
A1 Doris Maier
A1 Rüdiger Rupp
A1 Norbert Weidner
A1 Armin Curt
A1 John K. Kramer
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/03/2020.09.01.20185413.abstract
AB The absence of effective pharmacological interventions in acute traumatic spinal cord injury is a major problem in its management. A critical barrier in identifying such interventions lies in the vast heterogeneity of recovery profiles, which masks the potential efficacy of treatments in clinical trials. To determine the impact of temporal recovery profiles on long-term functional independence, we used EMSCI (European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury) data. Total motor scores from the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) were used to assess neurological and functional outcomes, respectively. We developed a classification method consisting of thresholding and unsupervised machine learning clustering and applied it to the total motor score profiles. Comparing SCIM scores between classes revealed that functional independence is significantly higher among patients displaying advanced neurological recovery profile. Our study suggests that the evaluation of temporal recovery profiles can provide novel insights in spinal cord injury clinical trials.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT01571531Funding StatementGouvernement du Canada | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR): John KramerInternational Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (IRP): John Kramer Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The EMSCI study was done in accordance with the ethics standards in the updated version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committees, and the patients gave informed, oral consent before entering the study. The data analysis phase was approved by the University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Quantification and statistical analysis were performed in Matlab, and the code will be provided upon request. https://www.emsci.org/index.php/project/the-database