TY - JOUR T1 - Systematic review and meta-analysis of veterinary-related occupational exposures to hazards JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.09.02.20186775 SP - 2020.09.02.20186775 AU - OO Adebowale AU - OG Fasanmi AU - B.B Awosile AU - MO Afolabi AU - FO Fasina Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/03/2020.09.02.20186775.abstract N2 - Objective Understanding hazards within the veterinary profession is critical for developing strategies to ensure health and safety in the work environment. This study was conducted to systematically review and synthesize data on reported risks within veterinary workplaces.Methods A systematic review of published data reporting occupational hazards and associated risk factors were searched within three database platforms namely PubMed, Ebscohost, and Google scholar. To determine the proportion estimates of hazards and pooled odds ratio, two random-effects meta-analysis were performed.Results Data showed veterinarians and students were at high risk of exposure to diverse physical, chemical, and biological hazards. For the biological, chemical and physical hazards, the pooled proportion estimates were 17% (95% CI: 15.0–19.0, p < 0.001), 7.0% (95% CI: 6.0–9.0%, p < 0.001) and 65.0% (95% CI: 39.0–91.0%, p < 0.001) respectively. A pooled odds ratio indicated the odds of physical (OR = 1.012, 95% CI: 1.008–1.017, p < 0.001) and biological exposures (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.70–2.52, p < 0.001) increased more when working with or in contact with animals than non-contact.Conclusions This review has provided a better understanding of occupational health and safety status of veterinarians and gaps within the developing countries. Veterinarians including students are at considerable risk of occupational-related hazards. The need to improve government and organisation policies and measures on occupational health and safety is therefore crucial, most importantly in Africa.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot ApplicableFunding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below: IRB/Ethics committee reviews and approval need for this study, which is a systematic review and meta-analysis of published journalsAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request ER -