TY - JOUR T1 - Email vs. Instagram recruitment strategies for online survey research JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.09.01.20186262 SP - 2020.09.01.20186262 AU - Rafael R. Moraes AU - Marcos B. Correa AU - Ândrea Daneris AU - Ana B. Queiroz AU - João P. Lopes AU - Giana S. Lima AU - Maximiliano S. Cenci AU - Otávio P. D’Avila AU - Claudio M. Pannuti AU - Tatiana Pereira-Cenci AU - Flávio F. Demarco Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/03/2020.09.01.20186262.abstract N2 - In this study, we describe and evaluate a method for reaching a target population (i.e., dentists practicing in Brazil) to engage in survey research using traditional e-mail invites compared with recruitment campaigns created on Instagram. A pre-tested questionnaire was used and participants were recruited for 10 days via a source list of email addresses and two discrete Instagram organic open campaigns. A total of 3,122 responses were collected: 509 participants were recruited by email (2.1% response rate) and 2,613 by the two Instagram campaigns (20.7% and 11.7% conversion rates), respectively. Response/min collection rates in the first 24 h ranged between 0.23 (email) and 1.09 (first campaign). In total, 98.8% of all responses were received in the first 48 h for the different recruitment strategies. There were significant differences for all demographic variables (p<0.001) between email and Instagram respondents, except for sex (p=0.373). Instagram respondents were slightly older, had more professional experience (years in practice), and a higher graduate education level than email respondents. Moreover, most email and Instagram respondents worked in the public sector and private practice, respectively. Although both strategies could collect responses from all Brazilian regions, email responses were slightly better distributed across the five territorial areas compared to Instagram. In conclusion, this study provides evidence that survey recruitment of a large sample using Instagram is feasible. However, using Instagram to engage participants is challenging and has limitations that warrant further investigation. Combination of email and Instagram recruitment led to a more diverse population and improved response rates.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThe study was not registered but the research protocol, questionnaire in its original language, databank of responses, and other study-related information have been published in an open platform (doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/DNBGS).Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/dnbgs/ Funding StatementThis study was financed by Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Brazil (PRONEX 16/2551-0000471-4, grant recipient FFD), Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil (Finance Code 001, institucional grant) and CAPES, Brazil (PROCAD 3001/2014, grant recipient RRM; and PRINT 88881.309861/2018-01, grant recipient FFD). The sponsors had no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing the report, or decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by our institutional review board (#4.015.536).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) and The SUrvey Reporting GuidelinE (SURGE) were consulted for this report. A checklist of CHERRIES items is provided in the Appendix. https://osf.io/dnbgs/ ER -