PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sarwan Kumar
AU  - Deepak Gupta
TI  - Diversity During Recruitment At An Internal Medicine Residency Program
AID  - 10.1101/2020.09.01.20186221
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.09.01.20186221
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/03/2020.09.01.20186221.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/03/2020.09.01.20186221.full
AB  - Background The right problem for graduate medical education (GME) program directors is whether diversity in their GME programs is as good as diversity in feeder entities to their GME programs. Generally, the feeder entities to GME residency programs are their affiliated medical schools. However, the specific feeder entities to GME residency programs are the unfiltered applicants’ pool who apply to these programs through Electronic Residency Application Service® (ERAS®).Objectives To analyze associations in diversity among the GME applicants, the GME interviewees and the GME residents within an internal medicine residency program assuming that unfiltered applicants’ pool is the specific feeder entity to the analyzed GME program.Methods We analyzed associations in age-group, gender, ethnicity and race diversity among the GME applicants, the GME interviewees and the GME residents within an internal medicine residency program for ERAS® 2018-2020 seasons to decipher Cramer’s V as association coefficients (“diversity scores”).Results The only significant finding was that among Not Hispanic or Latino ethnicity applications, race of ERAS® applicants had a very weak association with them being called for interviews or them becoming residents during ERAS® 2019 season as well as during the entire three-season-period (2018-2020).Conclusion Race of Not Hispanic or Latino ethnicity ERAS® applicants had a very weak association with them being called for interviews or them becoming residents at the analyzed internal medicine residency program.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding support to reportAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Non-Human Participant Research Per Wayne State University, Institutional Review Board, Detroit MI 48201All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data as tabulated in the manuscript is available for review.