TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating the design and implementation of an adapted Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to improve health system bottlenecks in Nigeria JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.08.31.20185322 SP - 2020.08.31.20185322 AU - Ejemai Amaize Eboreime AU - John Olajide Olawepo AU - Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas AU - Rohit Ramaswamy Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/09/02/2020.08.31.20185322.abstract N2 - Background The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is fundamental to many quality improvement (QI) models. For the approach to be effective in the real-world, variants must align with standard elements of the PDSA at the design stage. The adapted design must also be implemented with fidelity. Gaps at the adaptation or implementation stages result in design and implementation failures respectively. Using Taylor’s framework, this study evaluates the alignment between theory, design and implementation of the DIVA (Diagnose-Intervene-Verify-Adjust) model, a PDSA variant adapted for Nigeria’s health system performance improvement.Methods An iterative consensus building approach was used to develop a scorecard evaluating new conceptual indices of design and implementation of QI interventions (design and implementation index, defects and gaps). The scorecard assigned quantitative scores that measured the extent to which the reported or documented design or implementation activity aligned with Taylor’s theoretical framework.Results Design (adaptation) scores were across all standard features indicating that design was well adapted to the typical PDSA. Conversely, implementation fidelity scores were only optimal with two standard features: prediction-based test of change and the use of data over time. The other features, use of multiple iterative cycles and documentation, had implementation gaps of 17% and 50% respectively. This may imply that observed effectiveness deficits of DIVA may be attributable to implementation rather than design gaps.Conclusions The effectiveness of QI interventions depend of good contextual adaptation and implementation fidelity such that core features (theory and internal logic) must not be compromised. This study demonstrates how both adaptation and implementation are important for success of QI interventions. It also presents an approach for evaluating other QI models using Taylor’s PDSA assessment framework as a guide, which might serve to strengthen the theory behind future QI models, and provide guidance on their appropriate use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the National Health Research Ethics Committee of Nigeria (NHREC/01/01/2007-13/08/2016).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available upon reasonable request ER -