RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Development of Diagnostic Score for Acute Pericarditis in Patients Admitted for Chest Pain
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.08.19.20176750
DO 10.1101/2020.08.19.20176750
A1 André Costa Meireles
A1 João Vitor Miranda Porto Oliveira
A1 Bruna de Sá Barreto Pontes
A1 Alexandre Costa Souza
A1 Laila Caroline Oliveira Souza Barbosa Gomes
A1 Thomaz Emanoel Azevedo Silva
A1 Milton Henrique Vitoria de Melo
A1 Gabriela Oliveira Bagano
A1 Márcia Maria Noya Rabelo
A1 Luis Claudio Lemos Correia
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/31/2020.08.19.20176750.abstract
AB Background Despite the presence of clinical, laboratory and electrocardiographic characteristics suggestive of acute pericarditis, there is no multivariate diagnostic score developed for this condition.Objective To develop a clinical score for diagnosis of pericarditis as the cause of acute chest pain, using data from admission.Methods In a diagnostic case-control study, we compared consecutive 45 patients of the Chest Pain Registry diagnosed of pericarditis (confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging or the presence of pleural effusion in echocardiography) versus 90 patients with an alternative confirmed diagnosis, randomly selected from our registry. Six clinical characteristics, 16 chest pain characteristics and 4 additional tests were candidates as predictors. Logistic regression was used to derivate a model composed by independent predictors of pericarditis.Results Among 17 variables associated with pericarditis, 5 remained independent predictors: age; pain aggravation with thorax movement; positive troponin; diffuse ST-segment elevation and C-reactive protein. Each independent predictor was attributed points proportional to its regression coefficient. The final score presented discriminatory capacity represented by C-statistic of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.93 – 1.0). The best cutoff point was defined as > 6 points, with sensitivity of 96% (95% CI = 85 – 100), specificity of 87% (95% CI = 78 – 93), positive likelihood ratio of 7.2 (95% CI = 4.2 – 12) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.05 (95% CI = 0.01 – 0.2).Conclusion The proposed multivariate score seems to be accurate for the diagnosis of pericarditis and require further validation in an independent sample.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding Statementno external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The protocol is in accordance with declaration of Helsinki, approved by Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Sao Rafael, Salvador Brazil. All evaluated patients signed the informed consent form. Research project number 35/11 at 25/07/2011 according by the resolution number 196/96 of Health Nacional Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available