TY - JOUR T1 - The effectiveness of a FY-1 doctor preparation course for final year medical students JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.08.24.20180109 SP - 2020.08.24.20180109 AU - William Beedham AU - Kasun Wanigasooriya AU - Georgia R. Layton AU - Ley Taing Chan AU - Adnan Darr AU - Devender Mittapalli Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/26/2020.08.24.20180109.abstract N2 - Background Starting work as a junior doctor can be daunting for any medical student. There are numerous aspects of the hidden or informal curriculum which many students fail to acquire during their training.Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a novel foundation year one (FY1) doctor preparation course focusing on certain core topics, practical tips and components of the hidden curriculum. The primary objective was to improve the confidence level and knowledge of final year medical student transition to FY1 doctors.Method A two-day, practical course titled “Preparation 2 Practice” delivering hands-on, small-group and lecture-based teaching, covering core medical student undergraduate curriculum topics in medicine and surgery. The course content spanned therapeutics, documentation skills and managing acute clinical tasks encountered by FY1 doctors during an on-call shift. A pre- and post-course survey and knowledge assessment were carried out to assess the effectiveness of the course. The assessment was MCQ-based, derived from topics covered within our course. The 20-question test and a short survey were administered electronically.Results Twenty students from a single UK medical school attended the course. 100% participation was observed in the pre- and post-course test and survey. The median post-course test result was 22 (IQR 20.25 –23.75) which was higher than the median pre course test score of 18.75 (IQR 17–21.75). A Wilcoxon sign rank test revealed a statistically significant difference between the pre- and post-course test results (p=0.0003). The self-reported confidence score of delegates on starting work as a junior doctor was also significantly higher following the course (p=0.004).Conclusion The results show a significant improvement in perceived confidence and knowledge on core curriculum topics amongst final year medical students having attended our FY1 doctor preparation course. We conclude that there is scope for similar supplementary courses as an adjunct to the undergraduate medical curriculum.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Master Surgeon Trust (TMS) (UK small charity, HMRC ref EW: 03332) funded this course. The Heart of England Foundation Trust (now University Hospitals Birmingham Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust) provided the venue for the course.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project was conducted as part of an internal quality control audit of The Master Surgeon Trust (UK Charity EW0332), which developed, organised and ran this course. The audit process was authorised by the charity executive committee. The Medical Research Council, Health Research Authority "Is my study research?" online tool (http://www.hra-decisiontools.org.uk/research/) was used to confirm that this study was not research. Therefore, research ethics committee review or health research authority approval was not required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data has been included within the tables of the manuscript. A full data set is in the possession of the authors. ER -