RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients with Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Data JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.08.20.20177311 DO 10.1101/2020.08.20.20177311 A1 Kong, Xiangyi A1 Qi, Yihang A1 Huang, junjie A1 Zhao, Yang A1 Zhan, Yongle A1 Qin, Xuzhen A1 Qi, Zhihong A1 Atanda, Adejare (Jay) A1 Zhang, Lei A1 Wang, Jing A1 Fang, Yi A1 Jia, Peng A1 Golozar, Asieh A1 Zhang, Lin A1 Jiang, Yu YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/22/2020.08.20.20177311.abstract AB Summary Background Data on the prevalence of cancer in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected patients and the severe illness incidence and mortality of COVID-19 patients with cancers remains unclear.Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, from database inception to July 15, 2020, for studies of patients with COVID-19 infection that had available comorbidity information on cancer. The primary endpoint was the pooled prevalence of cancer in COVID-19 patients and the secondary endpoint was the outcomes of COVID-19-infected cancer patients with incidence of severe illness and death rate. We calculated the pooled prevalence and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a random-effects model, and performed meta-regression analyses to explore heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on continent, country, age, sample size and study design.Findings A total of 107 eligible global studies were included in the systematic review. 90 studies with 94,845 COVID-19 patients in which 4,106 patients with cancer morbidity were included in the meta-analysis for prevalence of cancer morbidity among COVID-19 patients. 21 studies with 70,969 COVID-19 patients in which 3,351 patients with cancer morbidity who had severe illness or death during the studies. The overall prevalence of cancer among the COVID-19 patients was 0.07 (95% CI 0.05∽0.09). The cancer prevalence in COVID-19 patients of Europe (0.22, 95% CI 0.17∽0.28) was higher than that in Asia Pacific (0.04, 95% CI 0.03∽0.06) and North America (0.05, 95% CI 0.04∽0.06). The prevalence of COVID-19-infected cancer patients over 60 years old was 0.10 (95% CI 0.07∽0.14), higher than that of patients equal and less than 60 years old (0.05, 95% CI 0.03∽0.06). The pooled prevalence of severe illness among COVID-19 patients with cancers was 0.35 (95% CI 0.27∽0.43) and the pooled death rate of COVID-19 patients with cancers was 0.18 (95% CI 0.14∽0.18). The pooled incidence of severe illness of COVID-19 patients with cancers from Asia Pacific, Europe, and North America were 0.38(0.24, 0.52), 0.36(0.17, 0.55), and 0.26(0.20, 0.31), respectively; and the pooled death rate from Asia Pacific, Europe, and North America were 0.17(0.10, 0.24), 0.26(0.13, 0.39), and 0.19(0.13, 0.25), respectively.Interpretation To our knowledge, this study is the most comprehensive and up-to-date metaanalysis assessing the prevalence of cancer among COVID-19 patients, severe illness incidence and mortality rate. The prevalence of cancer varied significantly in geographical continents and age. The COVID-19 patients with cancer were at-risk for severe illness and a high death rate. The European COVID-19 patients had the highest cancer prevalence among the three continents examined and were also the most likely to progress to severe illness and death. Although the Asia Pacific COVID-19 patients had the lowest cancer prevalence, their severe illness rate was similar to that of European’s.Evidence before this study Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a newly discovered coronavirus, which leads to respiratory illness and can be transmitted from person to person. As the infection has become widespread, concern for the influence of COVID-19 on patients with cancer has grown. Previous studies suggest that patients with a history of active malignancy might be at increased risk for COVID-19, developing COVID-19-related complications and having a poorer prognosis. Until now, however, few studies explored the following two questions: 1) what is the estimated prevalence of cancer patients with COVID-19 infection; and 2) do COVID-19-infected cancer-patients have distinct clinical courses and worse outcomes compared with COVID-19-infected patients without cancers. The latter is based on the former to further explore the characteristics of clinical outcomes of such patients. The clarification of these two questions will greatly help to understand the relationship between COVID-19 and cancer in terms of clinical epidemiology, and thus facilitate the formulation of targeted and relevant public health policies.Added value of this study To our knowledge, this systematic review and meta-analysis of 107 studies is the most comprehensive and up-to-date assessing the prevalence of cancer among COVID-19 patients, the incidence of severe illness and mortality rate of COVID-19 patients with cancers. We provided a relatively accurate overall cancer prevalence among the all COVID-19 patients (7%), stratified by geographical continent, country, age, study sample size, and study design type. We also presented the pooled severe illness and mortality rates stratified by continent. European COVID-19-infected cancer patients seemed the most likely to both develop cancer and progress to severe illness and death.Implications of all the available evidence Our findings have reinforced important considerations of clinical care and emphasized the urgent unmet needs for COVID-19 patients with cancers using the pooled prevalence, incidence of severe illness, and death rates as evidence. Also, after comparing the cancer prevalence, incidence of severe illness, and death rate of COVID-19 patients from different continents, European population may require stronger control measures than the Asia Pacific and North American populations. In the future, as more data will be available, it will be interesting to further investigate the differences of sociodemographic and climcopathological features between COVID-19-infected patients with cancer and without cancer.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 7204293 and No. 7191009), the Special Research Fund for Central Universities, Peking Union Medical College (No. 3332019053), the Beijing Hope Run Special Fund of Cancer Foundation of China (No. LC2019B03 and No. LC2019L07), the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81872160), and National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC1315000 and No. 2018YFC1315003). The funders have no conflicts of interests. The funders of the study had no roles in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding authors have full access to all the data in the study and have final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College institutional review board approved this study as exempt.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data were abstracted from the published paper.