PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Denford, Sarah
AU  - Morton, Kate
AU  - Horwood, Jeremy
AU  - Garang, Rachel de
AU  - Yardley, Lucy
TI  - Preventing within household transmission of COVID-19: Is self-isolation outside the home feasible and acceptable?
AID  - 10.1101/2020.08.20.20176529
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.08.20.20176529
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/22/2020.08.20.20176529.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/22/2020.08.20.20176529.full
AB  - Background Within-household transmission of COVID-19 is responsible for a significant number of infections. The risk of within-household infection is greatly increased among those from Black Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) and low income communities. Efforts to protect these communities are urgently needed. The aim of this study is to explore the acceptability of provision of accommodation to support isolation outside the home among at risk populations.Methods Our study used a mixed methods design structured in two phases. In phase 1, we conducted a survey study of a sample of volunteers from our existing database of 300 individuals who had provided consent to be contacted about ongoing research projects into reducing infection transmission. In phase 2, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 participants from BAME communities and low income communities recruited through social media.Results Many participants from both the survey and interview phase of the study viewed the provision of accommodation to support isolation as both important and necessary to protect the household and control the virus. Factors influencing likely uptake of accommodation included perceived 1) vulnerability of household 2) exposure to the virus and 3) options for isolation within the home. Barriers to isolation outside the home included 1) being able to isolate at home 2) not wanting to be apart from family 3) caring for others 4) concerns about the implications of isolation for mental wellbeing 5) upheaval of moving when ill and 6) perceived risk to and from others in the building. Participants raised a series of issues surrounding the provision of accommodation outside the home that should be addressed before it could be offered. These included questions regarding who should use temporary accommodation and at what stage to effectively reduce transmission in the home, and how infection control in temporary accommodation would be managed. Concerns were also raised among those with caring duties and responsibilities.Conclusion This research provides evidence that the provision of accommodation to support isolation outside the home is viewed as acceptable, feasible and necessary by many people who are concerned about infection transmission in the home. We explore ways in which isolation outside the home might be offered to suit the needs of people in different circumstances. In particular, vulnerable members of the household could be protected if accommodation is offered to individuals who are informed through test trace and isolate that they have been in contact with the virus.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol, in partnership with Public Health England (PHE). Lucy Yardley is an NIHR Senior Investigator and her research programme is partly supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West, NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, and the NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). Jeremy Horwood is partly supported by NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)-West, and NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) for Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social Care, or PHE. The funders had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, or in writing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for Phase 1 was provided by Southampton Research Ethics Committee (56445). All survey participants consented online to take part in the study. Ethical approval for Phase 2 was provided by the NHS Health Research Authority London Queen Square Research Ethics Committee (20/HRA/2549). All interview participants verbally consented to take part in the study. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.