Dehumanisation and Datafication: Key stressors of Algorithmic Management: A qualitative analysis of Chinese couriers - Wei, Hua; Shi, Huiyue; Kou, Yilin; Yu, Mengke; Li, Shugang; O’Toole, Thomas; Armitage, Christopher J.; Chandola, Tarani; Whelan, Pauline; Zhang, Yanchun; Xu, Yan; van Tongeren, Martie (medRxiv, 2025)
Introduction Technology is an important social determinant of health that has so far been poorly understood. Nevertheless, technologies such as algorithms and artificial intelligence are rapidly changing how work is organised and managed globally. Courier work is one of the most affected occupations due to the common use of digital labour platforms. This study will explore how AM shapes Chinese couriers’ work experience and engenders health inequity.Method We conducted 15 in-depth interviews with couriers in May-June 2021 in China. Thematic analysis was completed using Nvivo 12.Results AM can introduce new work stressors and interact with existing factors to alleviate or intensify work stress. Couriers’ responses to AM and its effects varied as some felt motivated while others frustrated. Key themes emerged from the interviews included ‘App the “boss”’, ‘Unequal exposure to AM and the role of human support’, ‘New work stressors of AM – Dehumanisation and Datafication’, ‘Job stressors intensified by AM’ and ‘Varying individual response to AM’. App ‘the boss’ described how the couriers felt when managed by algorithms. Employed, gig and agency couriers had different exposure to AM and human support of different quality. Dehumanisation characterizes how algorithmic systems fulfil managerial functions in ways that differ from managers qualitatively or quantitatively. Datafication refers to the conversion of real-world information and user behaviour into data and being input in the system to assist automated decision-making. Couriers also reported that the use of digital methods could intensify some work stressors, e.g. time pressure and customer behaviour. Nevertheless, some couriers reported that AM provided new job resources, e.g. flexible hours, job opportunities, pay transparency, and bypassing office politics.Conclusion This paper identified key work stressors of AM and explored how AM interacts with existing work stressors to shape Chinese couriers’ work experience. Dehumanisation could reduce the quality of support and their sense of relatedness to the workplace. Datafication or extraction of data from workers and lack of transparency led to concerns about potential discrimination, workplace unfairness and power imbalance. Couriers’ responses to AM varied and future research should take such heterogeneity into account.Competing Interest StatementPW is a director and shareholder of CareLoop Health Ltd, a digital mental health company.Funding StatementThe project is funded by the MRC Public Health Intervention Development Scheme (PHIND). Grant Ref: MR/T027215/1. CA is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University Research Ethics Committee at University of Manchester, Ref: 2021-8761-18609 and Ethics Review Committee at the Beijing Normal University, Ref: 20200113011 gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the first author