PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Carly Levine AU - Courtney Grady AU - Thomas Block AU - Harry Hurley AU - Riccardo Russo AU - Blas Peixoto AU - Alexis Frees AU - Alejandro Ruiz AU - David Alland TI - Use, reuse or discard: quantitatively defined variance in N95 respirator integrity following vaporized hydrogen peroxide decontamination during the COVID-19 pandemic AID - 10.1101/2020.08.18.20177071 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.08.18.20177071 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/21/2020.08.18.20177071.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/21/2020.08.18.20177071.full AB - Background COVID-19 has stretched the ability of many institutions to supply needed personal protective equipment, especially N95 respirators. N95 decontamination and reuse programs provide one potential solution to this problem. Unfortunately, a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of decontamination on the integrity of various N95 models using a quantitative fit test (QTFT) approach is lacking.Aims 1) To investigate the effects of up to eight rounds of vaporized H2O2 (VHP) decontamination on the integrity of N95 respirators currently in use in a hospital setting. 2) To examine if N95 respirators worn by one user can adapt to the face shape of a second user with no compromise of integrity following VHP decontamination.Methods The PortaCount Pro+ Respirator Fit Tester Model 8038 was used to quantitatively define the integrity, measured by fit, of N95 respirators following decontamination with VHP.Findings There was an observable downward trend in the integrity of Halyard Fluidshield 46727 N95 respirators throughout eight cycles of decontamination with VHP. The integrity of 3M 1870 N95 respirators was significantly reduced after the respirator was worn, decontaminated with VHP, and then quantitatively fit tested on a second user. Furthermore, we uncovered inconsistencies between qualitative fit test and QTFT results that may have strong implications on the fit testing method used by institutions.Conclusions Our data revealed variability in the integrity of different N95 models after VHP decontamination and exposed potential limitations of N95 decontamination and reuse programs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by University Hospital, Newark NJ; and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [grant number T32AI125185].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Experiments involving fit testing and decontamination of N95 respirators was part of the public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic and were thus considered exempt from institutional review board approval. All participants gave informed consent prior to participating in any experiments.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available within the manuscript and supplementary material.