PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Liu, Zheng AU - Mu, Jingsong AU - Fan, Wenxiang TI - Investigation into Quality of Life and Psychological Status of Different Populations during COVID-19: A study concerning Surrounding Areas of Wuhan AID - 10.1101/2020.08.15.20158725 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.08.15.20158725 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/18/2020.08.15.20158725.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/18/2020.08.15.20158725.full AB - Objective To investigate different populations’ quality of life and psychological status in surrounding areas of Wuhan during COVID-19 pandemic.Methods The data of 248 residents living in Anhui from February 4 to 6 of 2020 were collected through network surveys including age, gender, occupation, the World Health Organization Quality of Life measurement Scale short form (World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument brief, WHOQOL BREF), Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (Self-rating Anxiety Scale, SAS and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Those surveyed, divided into two groups: medical staff (129 cases) and nonmedical staff (119 cases), were made statistic analysis according to the factors mentioned above.Results The WHOQOL-BREF of medical staff in this region was lower than that of nonmedical staff in the fields of physiology, psychology, social relations, and environment, among whom female medical staff scored significantly lower than that of male medical staff in four fields. There was no significant statistical difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups, and gender had no significant influence on SAS and SDS scores of medical staff.Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, medical staff enjoyed a lower quality of life in surrounding areas of Wuhan than that of nonmedical staff, and female medical staff even lower, which should arouse social concerns.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialnoneFunding StatementThis study received no funding from other institutions.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of USTCAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analyzed during this study are presented in the manuscript. Please contact the first author for access to the data presented in this study.