%0 Journal Article %A C Heneghan %A EA Spencer %A J Brassey %A T Jefferson %T SARS-CoV-2 and the Role of Orofecal Transmission: Systematic Review %D 2020 %R 10.1101/2020.08.04.20168054 %J medRxiv %P 2020.08.04.20168054 %X Background How SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted is of key public health importance. SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in the feces of some Covid-19 patients which suggests the possibility that the virus could additionally be transmitted via the orofecal route.Methods This review is part of an Open Evidence Review on Transmission Dynamics of Covid-19. We conduct ongoing searches using LitCovid, medRxiv, Google Scholar and Google for Covid-19; assess study quality based on five criteria and report important findings on an ongoing basis. Where necessary authors are contacted for further details or clarification on the content of their articles.Results We found 59 studies: nine reviews and 51 primary studies or reports (one cohort study also included a review) examining the potential role of orofecal transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Half (n=29) were done in China. Thirty seven studies reported positive fecal samples for SARS-CoV-2 based on RT-PCR results (n=1,034 patients). Six studies reported isolating the virus from fecal samples of nine patients, one study isolated the virus from rectal tissue and one laboratory study found that SARS-CoV-2 productively infected human small intestinal organoids. Eleven studies report on fecal samples found in sewage, and two sampled bathrooms and toilets.Conclusions Various observational and mechanistic evidence support the hypothesis that SARS-CoV-2 can infect and be shed from the human gastrointestinal tract. Policy should emphasize the importance of strict personal hygiene measures, and chlorine-based disinfection of surfaces in locations where there is presumed or known SARS-CoV-2 activity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis review received funding support from the National Institute of Health Research School of Primary Care Research (NIHR SPCR) Evidence Synthesis Working Group Project 380. and Funding from the David and Maria Willetts Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:no IRB/oversight required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThje data is avialbe in our open evidence review: Analysis of the Transmission Dynamics of COVID-19: An Open Evidence Review, that is investigating factors and circumstances that impact on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, based on our published protocol. https://www.cebm.net/evidence-synthesis/transmission-dynamics-of-covid-19/ %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/08/10/2020.08.04.20168054.full.pdf