RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Exploring perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians on virtual reality as a precursor to using telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.01.07.20016782
DO 10.1101/2020.01.07.20016782
A1 Helen Morse
A1 Laura Biggart
A1 Valerie Pomeroy
A1 Stéphanie Rossit
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/06/2020.01.07.20016782.abstract
AB Spatial neglect is a common and severe cognitive consequence of stroke, yet there is currently no effective rehabilitation tool. Virtual Reality (VR) telerehabilitation tools have the potential to provide multisensory and enjoyable neuropsychological therapies and remotely monitor adherence without the presence of a therapist at all times. Researchers and industry need to better understand end-user perspectives about these technologies to ensure these are acceptable and user-friendly and, ultimately, optimize adherence and efficacy. Therefore, this study aims to explore end-user perspectives on the use of self-administered VR for spatial neglect in a university environment to identify barriers and facilitators prior to extending its use remotely or within the home as a VR telerehabilitation tool. We used a mixed-method design including focus groups, self-administered questionnaires and individual interviews with stroke survivors (N = 7), their carers (N = 3) and stroke clinicians (N = 6). End-user perspectives identified clarity of instructions, equipment (cost, available resources) and for some, level of experience with technology as barriers of use. Perceived facilitators of use were performance feedback, engagement and enjoyment, and psychological benefits associated by self-administered VR telerehabilitation. Overall, end-users were positive and interested in using VR telerehabilitation for spatial neglect. These perspectives enabled us to produce practical recommendations to inform development, enhance engagement and uptake of self-administered VR telerehabilitation and inform feasibility and usability studies.Competing Interest StatementEvolv Rehabilitation Technologies provided a free license of VirtualRehab to the research team during this study. The research team are collaborating with Evolv Rehabilitation Technologies in the development of c-SIGHT. No payments have been received by the research team from Evolv Rehabilitation Technologies to conduct any of this research or to develop c-SIGHT.Clinical TrialNot a clinical trialFunding StatementWe would like to thank all the stroke survivors, carers and clinicians for their useful comments and kind cooperation during this study. We also thank the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. This research was supported by the University of East Anglia Innovation Proof-of-Concept Fund 2017-2018. C-SIGHT developments were also funded by a grant to SR and VP from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Brain Injury MedTech Co-operative based at Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and University of Cambridge. HM is currently funded by a grant from The Stroke Association to SR, HM and VP.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesN/A