TY - JOUR T1 - Testing for SARS-CoV-2 in care home staff and residents in English care homes: A service evaluation JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.08.04.20165928 SP - 2020.08.04.20165928 AU - Emma Smith AU - Clare F Aldus AU - Julii Brainard AU - Sharon Dunham AU - Paul R Hunter AU - Nicholas Steel AU - Paul Everden Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/06/2020.08.04.20165928.abstract N2 - Background COVID-19 has especially affected care home residents.Aim To evaluate a nurse-led Enhanced Care Home Team (ECHT) enhanced SARS-CoV-2 testing strategy.Design and setting Service evaluation in care homes in Norfolk UK.Method Residents and staff received nose and throat swab tests (7 April to 29 June 2020). Resident test results were linked with symptoms on days 0-14 after test and mortality to 13 July 2020.Results Residents (n=518) in 44 homes and staff (n=340) in 10 care homes were tested. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was identified in 103 residents in 14 homes and 49 staff in seven homes. Of 103 SARS-CoV-2+ residents, just 38 had typical symptom(s) at time of test (new cough and/or fever). Amongst 54 residents who were completely asymptomatic when tested, 12 (22%) developed symptoms within 14 days. Compared to SARS-CoV-2 negative residents, SARS-CoV-2+ residents were more likely to exhibit typical symptoms (new cough (n=26, p=0.001); fever (n=24, p=<0.001)) or as ‘generally unwell’ (n=18, p=0.001). Of 38 resident deaths, 21 (55%) were initially attributed to SARS-CoV-2, all of whom tested SARS-CoV-2+. One death not initially attributed to SARS-CoV-2 also tested positive.Conclusion Testing identified asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic SARS-CoV-2+ residents and staff. Being ‘generally unwell’ was common amongst symptomatic residents and may indicate SARS-CoV-2 infection in older people in the absence of more ‘typical’ symptoms. Where a resident appears generally unwell SARS-CoV-2-infection should be suspected. Protocols for testing involved integrated health and social care teams.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis service evaluation was supported By Norfolk and Waveney CCG and UEA Health and Social Care Partners. Dr. Brainard and Professor Hunter are affiliated to the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response at Kings College London in partnership with Public Health England (PHE) in collaboration with the University of East Anglia. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, UEA or the Department of Health or Public Health England.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Approvals for this service evaluation were granted to authors PE and CA by Norfolk and Waveney Clinical Commissioning Group (5 June 2020) and University of East Anglia Faculty of Medicine and Health Ethics Committee (15 June 2020, reference 2019/20-139), respectively.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available on request from the corresponding author. ER -