PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - K Pickles AU - E Cvejic AU - B Nickel AU - T Copp AU - C Bonner AU - J Leask AU - J Ayre AU - C Batcup AU - S Cornell AU - T Dakin AU - RH Dodd AU - JMJ Isautier AU - KJ McCaffery TI - COVID-19: Beliefs in misinformation in the Australian community AID - 10.1101/2020.08.04.20168583 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.08.04.20168583 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/06/2020.08.04.20168583.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/06/2020.08.04.20168583.full AB - Objectives To investigate prevalence of beliefs in COVID-19 misinformation and examine whether demographic, psychosocial and cognitive factors are associated with these beliefs, and how they change over time.Study design Prospective national longitudinal community online survey.Setting Australian general public.Participants Adults aged over 18 years (n=4362 baseline/Wave 1; n=1882 Wave 2; n=1369 Wave 3).Main outcome measure COVID-19 misinformation beliefs.Results Stronger agreement with misinformation beliefs was significantly associated with younger age, male gender, lower education, and primarily speaking a language other than English at home (all p<0.01). After controlling for these variables, misinformation beliefs were significantly associated (p<0.001) with lower digital health literacy, lower perceived threat of COVID-19, lower confidence in government, and lower trust in scientific institutions. The belief that the threat of COVID-19 is “greatly exaggerated” increased between Wave 1-2 (p=0.002), while belief that herd immunity benefits were being covered up decreased (p<0.001). Greatest support from a list of Australian Government identified myths was for those regarding ‘hot temperatures killing the virus’ (22%) and ‘Ibuprofen exacerbates COVID-19’ (13%). Lower institutional trust and greater rejection of official government accounts were associated with greater support for COVID-19 myths after controlling for sociodemographic variables.Conclusion These findings highlight important gaps in communication effectiveness. Stronger endorsement of misinformation was associated with male gender, younger age, lower education and language other than English spoken at home. Misinformation can undermine public health efforts. Public health authorities must urgently target groups identified in this study when countering misinformation and seek ways to enhance public trust of experts, governments, and institutions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee Project number: 2020/212All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, KP, upon reasonable request.