TY - JOUR T1 - EVALUATION OF THE DURABILITY OF LONG-LASTING INSECTICIDAL NETS IN GUATEMALA JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.07.30.20165316 SP - 2020.07.30.20165316 AU - María Eugenia Castellanos AU - Soledad Rodas AU - Jose Guillermo Juarez AU - Juan Carlos Lol AU - Sayra Chanquin AU - Zoraida Morales AU - Lucrecia Vizcaino AU - Stephen C. Smith AU - Jodi Vanden Eng AU - Henok G. Woldu AU - Audrey Lenhart AU - Norma Padilla Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/02/2020.07.30.20165316.abstract N2 - Background Insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) are widely used for the prevention and control of malaria. In Guatemala, since 2006, ITNs have been distributed free of charge in the highest risk malaria-endemic areas and constitute one of the primary vector control measures in the country. Despite relying on ITNs for almost 15 years, there is a lack of data to inform the timely replacement of ITNs whose effectiveness becomes diminished by routine use.Methods We assessed the survivorship, physical integrity, insecticide content and bio-efficacy of ITNs through cross-sectional surveys conducted at 18, 24 and 32 months after a 2012 distribution of PermaNet® 2.0 in a malaria focus in Guatemala. A total of 988 ITNs were analyzed (290 at 18 months, 349 at 24 months and 349 at 32 months).Results The functional survivorship of bednets decreased over time, from 92% at 18 months, to 81% at 24 months and 69% at 32 months. Independent of the time of the survey, less than 80% of the bednets that were still present in the household were reported to have been used the night before. Most of the bednets had been washed at least once (88% at 18 months, 92% at 24 months and 96% at 32 months). The proportion of bednets categorized as “in good condition” per WHO guidelines of the total hole surface area, diminished from 77% at 18 months to 58% at 32 months. The portion of ITNs with deltamethrin concentration less than 10mg/m2 increased over time (14% at 18 months, 23% at 24 months, and 35% at 32 months). Among the bednets for which bioassays were conducted, the percentage that met WHO criteria for efficacy dropped from 90% at 18 months to 52% at 32 months.Conclusion While our assessment demonstrated that nets were in relatively good physical condition over time, the combination of declining bio-efficacy over time and low use rates limited the overall effectiveness of the LLINs. Efforts to encourage the community to retain, use, and properly care for the LLINs may improve their impact. Durability assessments should be included in future campaigns.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe funding for this study was provided by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) via the Amazon Malaria Initiative (AMI), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the United States of America, Guatemalan Ministry of Public Health and Social Welfare and Center for Health Studies and Universidad del Valle de Guatemala. The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data and in writing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Oral informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to study inclusion. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Center for Health Studies at Universidad del Valle de Guatemala (Approval Number: 081-06-2013); CDC investigators were not considered to be engaged in human subjects research.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the senior author, NP. The data are not publicly available due to containing information that could compromise the privacy of participants.GISgeographic information systemGISgeographic information systemGPSGlobal positioning systemIQRinterquartile rangeITNInsecticide-treated bednetLLINlong-lasting insecticide-treated bednetLOESSLocally Weighted Scatterplot SmoothingMoHMinistry of HealthPDApersonal digital assistantTHSAtotal hole surface areatmmedian survival timeWHOWorld Health OrganizationXRFx-ray fluorescence ER -