@article {Gupta2020.07.29.20164814, author = {Marichi Gupta and Aditya Bansal and Bhav Jain and Jillian Rochelle and Atharv Oak and Mohammad S. Jalali}, title = {Whether the Weather Will Help Us Weather the COVID-19 Pandemic: Using Machine Learning to Measure Twitter Users{\textquoteright} Perceptions}, elocation-id = {2020.07.29.20164814}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1101/2020.07.29.20164814}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Objective The potential ability for weather to affect SARS-CoV-2 transmission has been an area of controversial discussion during the COVID-19 pandemic. Individuals{\textquoteright} perceptions of the impact of weather can inform their adherence to public health guidelines; however, there is no measure of their perceptions. We quantified Twitter users{\textquoteright} perceptions of the effect of weather and analyzed how they evolved with respect to real-world events and time.Materials and Methods We collected 166,005 tweets posted between January 23 and June 22, 2020 and employed machine learning/natural language processing techniques to filter for relevant tweets, classify them by the type of effect they claimed, and identify topics of discussion.Results We identified 28,555 relevant tweets and estimate that 40.4\% indicate uncertainty about weather{\textquoteright}s impact, 33.5\% indicate no effect, and 26.1\% indicate some effect. We tracked changes in these proportions over time. Topic modeling revealed major latent areas of discussion.Discussion There is no consensus among the public for weather{\textquoteright}s potential impact. Earlier months were characterized by tweets that were uncertain of weather{\textquoteright}s effect or claimed no effect; later, the portion of tweets claiming some effect of weather increased. Tweets claiming no effect of weather comprised the largest class by June. Major topics of discussion included comparisons to influenza{\textquoteright}s seasonality, President Trump{\textquoteright}s comments on weather{\textquoteright}s effect, and social distancing.Conclusion There is a major gap between scientific evidence and public opinion of weather{\textquoteright}s impacts on COVID-19. We provide evidence of public{\textquoteright}s misconceptions and topics of discussion, which can inform public health communications.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not applicable; no human was involved in this study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll analysis processes are documented in the supplementary materials. Contact the corresponding author for the raw data.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.07.29.20164814}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.07.29.20164814.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }