RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Persistence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in non-hospitalized COVID-19 convalescent health care workers JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.07.30.20164368 DO 10.1101/2020.07.30.20164368 A1 Margherita Bruni A1 Valentina Cecatiello A1 Angelica Diaz-Basabe A1 Georgia Lattanzi A1 Erika Mileti A1 Silvia Monzani A1 Laura Pirovano A1 Francesca Rizzelli A1 Clara Visintin A1 Giuseppina Bonizzi A1 Marco Giani A1 Marialuisa Lavitrano A1 Silvia Faravelli A1 Federico Forneris A1 Flavio Caprioli A1 Pier Giuseppe Pelicci A1 Gioacchino Natoli A1 Sebastiano Pasqualato A1 Marina Mapelli A1 Federica Facciotti YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.07.30.20164368.abstract AB Background Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a respiratory illness caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel beta-coronavirus. Although antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 can be detected early during the infection, several outstanding questions remain to be addressed regarding magnitude and persistence of antibody titer against different viral proteins and their correlation with the strength of the immune response, as measured by serum levels of pro-inflammatory mediators.Methods An ELISA assay has been developed by expressing and purifying the recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), Soluble Ectodomain (Spike), and full length nucleocapsid protein (N protein). Sera from healthcare workers affected by non-severe COVID-19 were longitudinally collected over four weeks, and compared to sera from patients hospitalized in Intensive Care Units (ICU) and SARS-CoV-2-negative subjects for the presence of IgM, IgG and IgA antibodies as well as soluble pro-inflammatory mediators in the sera.Results Specificity and sensitivity of the ELISA assays were high for anti-RBD IgG and IgA (92-97%) and slightly lower for IgM and the Spike and N proteins (70-85%). The ELISA allowed quantification of IgM, IgG and IgA antibody responses against all the viral antigens tested and showed a correlation between magnitude of the antibody response and disease severity. Non-hospitalized subjects showed lower antibody titers and blood pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles as compared to patients in Intensive Care Units (ICU), irrespective of the antibodies tested. Noteworthy, in non-severe COVID-19 infections, antibody titers against RBD and Spike, but not against the N protein, as well as pro-inflammatory cytokines decreased within a month after viral clearance.Conclusions Rapid decline in antibody titers and in pro-inflammatory cytokines may be a common feature of non-severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggesting that antibody-mediated protection against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 is of short duration. These results suggest caution in use serological testing to estimate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSupported by a generous contribution from Giuseppe Caprotti and the Fondazione Guido Venosta and partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente and 5x1000 funds; we thank the enthusiastic support of Francesco Niutta and Nicolo Fontana-RavaAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study has been conducted in accordance with the Standards of Good Clinical Practice, with the ethical principles deriving from the Helsinki Declaration and the current legislation on observational studies. Clearance from the Ethical Committee has been obtained (IEO1271)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yesnot applicable