PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Becher, Michael AU - Stegmueller, Daniel AU - Brouard, Sylvain AU - Kerrouche, Eric TI - Comparative experimental evidence on compliance with social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic AID - 10.1101/2020.07.29.20164806 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.07.29.20164806 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.07.29.20164806.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/01/2020.07.29.20164806.full AB - Social distancing is a central public health measure in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, but individuals’ compliance cannot be taken for granted. We use a survey experiment to examine the prevalence of non-compliance with social distancing in nine countries and test pre-registered hypotheses about individual-level characteristics associated with less social distancing. Leveraging a list experiment to control for social desirability bias, we find large cross-national variation in adherence to social distancing guidelines. Compliance varies systematically with COVID-19 fatalities and the strictness of lockdown measures. We also find substantial heterogeneity in the role of individual-level predictors. While there is an ideological gap in social distancing in the US and New Zealand, this is not the case in European countries. Taken together, our results suggest caution when trying to model pandemic health policies on other countries’ experiences. Behavioral interventions targeted towards specific demographics that work in one context might fail in another.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementBecher acknowledges IAST funding from the French National Research Agency (ANR) under the Investments for the Future (Investissements d'Avenir) program, grant ANR-17-EURE-0010. Brouard acknowledges the financial support from ANR - REPEAT grant (Special COVID-19), CNRS, Fondation de l'innovation politique, regions Nouvelle-Aquitaine and Occitanie. Stegmueller's research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A3A2066657).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Review Board for Ethical Standards in Research at the Toulouse School of Economics and the Institute for Advanced Study approved the study (ref.code 2020-04-001).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSurvey data and code files will be deposited on Harvard Dataverse upon publication.