TY - JOUR T1 - Brain-Computer Interface Robotics for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke: A Systematic Review JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2019.12.11.19014571 SP - 2019.12.11.19014571 AU - Paul Dominick E Baniqued AU - Emily C Stanyer AU - Muhammad Awais AU - Ali Alazmani AU - Andrew E Jackson AU - Mark A Mon-Williams AU - Faisal Mushtaq AU - Raymond J Holt Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/31/2019.12.11.19014571.abstract N2 - Background Hand rehabilitation is core to helping stroke survivors regain activities of daily living. Recent studies have suggested that the use of electroencephalography-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can promote this process. Here, we report the first systematic examination of the literature on the use of BCI-robot systems for the rehabilitation of fine motor skills associated with hand movement and profile these systems from a technical and clinical perspective.Methods A search for January 2010-October 2019 articles using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PEDro, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore and Cochrane Library databases was performed. The selection criteria included BCI-hand robotic systems for rehabilitation at different stages of development involving tests on healthy participants or people who have had a stroke. Data fields include those related to study design, participant characteristics, technical specifications of the system, and clinical outcome measures.Results 30 studies were identified as eligible for qualitative review and among these, 11 studies involved testing a BCI-hand robot on chronic and subacute stroke patients. Statistically significant improvements in motor assessment scores relative to controls were observed for three BCI-hand robot interventions. The degree of robot control for the majority of studies was limited to triggering the device to perform grasping or pinching movements using motor imagery. Most employed a combination of kinaesthetic and visual response via the robotic device and display screen, respectively, to match feedback to motor imagery.Conclusion 19 out of 30 studies on BCI-robotic systems for hand rehabilitation report systems at prototype or pre-clinical stages of development. Three studies report statistically significant improvements in functional recovery after stroke, but there is a need to develop a standard protocol for assessing technical and clinical outcomes so that the necessary evidence base on efficiency and efficacy can be developed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a Newton Fund PhD grant, ID 331486777, under the Newton-Agham partnership. The grant is funded by the UK Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and the Philippine Commission on Higher Education and delivered by the British Council. For further information, please visit www.newtonfund.ac.uk.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesA full database of selected studies including those extracted during the search and selection process is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.ADLActivities of Daily LivingANNArtificial Neural NetworkAOAction ObservationARAugmented RealityARATAction Research Arm TestBCIBrain-Computer InterfaceBMIBrain-Machine InterfaceCDRHCenter for Devices and Radiological HealthCNNConvolutional Neural NetworkCSDCovariate Shift DetectionCSPCommon Spatial PatternDCDirect CurrentECoGElectrocorticographyEEGElectroencephalographyEMGElectromyographyEOGElectrooculographyERDEvent-Related DesynchronisationERPEvent-Related PotentialERSEvent-Related SynchronisationERSPEvent-Related Spectral PerturbationFBCSPFilter Bank Common Spatial PatternFIRFinite Impulse ResponseFMA-UEFugl-Meyer Motor Assessment – Upper ExtremityGSGrip StrengthIIRInfinite Impulse ResponseLDALinear Discriminant AnalysisMEMotor ExecutionMIMotor ImageryPEDroPhysiotherapy Evidence DatabasePMAPremarket ApprovalPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysisPROSPEROInternational Prospective Register of Systematic ReviewsPSPinch StrengthQSRQuality System RequirementRCTRandomised Clinical TrialRNNRecurrent Neural NetworkSATStandard Arm TherapySVMSupport Vector MachineTRATechnology Readiness Assessment TRL Technology Readiness LevelsUK-MRCUnited Kingdom Medical Research CouncilVRVirtual Reality ER -