RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Are there causal relationships between ADHD and BMI? Evidence from multiple genetically informed designs
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.04.16.20067918
DO 10.1101/2020.04.16.20067918
A1 Chao-Yu Liu
A1 Tabea Schoeler
A1 Neil M Davies
A1 Hugo Peyre
A1 Kai-Xiang Lim
A1 Edward D Barker
A1 Clare Llewellyn
A1 Frank Dudbridge
A1 Jean-Baptiste Pingault
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/30/2020.04.16.20067918.abstract
AB Background Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Body Mass Index (BMI) are associated. However, it remains unclear whether this association reflects causal relationships in either direction, or confounding. Here, we implemented genetically informed methods to examine bidirectional causality and potential confounding.Methods Three genetically informed methods were employed: (1) cross-lagged twin-differences analysis to assess bidirectional effects of ADHD symptoms and BMI at ages 8, 12, 14 and 16 years in 2,386 pairs of monozygotic twins from the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS), (2) within- and between-family ADHD and BMI polygenic score (PS) analysis in 3,320 pairs of dizygotic TEDS twins and (3) two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) using summary statistics from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) on ADHD (N=55,374) and BMI (N=806,834).Results Mixed results were obtained across the three methods. Twin-difference analyses provided little support for cross-lagged associations between ADHD symptoms and BMI over time. PS analyses were consistent with bidirectional relationships between ADHD and BMI with plausible time-varying effects from childhood to adolescence. MR findings were also consistent with bidirectional causal effects between ADHD and BMI. Multivariable MR suggested the presence of substantial confounding in bidirectional relationships.Conclusions The three methods converged to highlight multiple sources of confounding in the association between ADHD and BMI. PS and MR analyses suggested plausible causal relationships in both directions. Possible explanations for mixed causal findings across methods are discussed.Key messagesWithin-family polygenic score and Mendelian randomization analyses were consistent with bidirectional causal effects between ADHD and BMI.Findings from different genetically informed methods suggested that multiple sources of confounding are at play, including genetic and shared environmental confounding, population stratification, assortative mating and dynastic effects.The ADHD polygenic score increasingly associated with BMI phenotype from childhood to adolescence, suggesting an increasing role of ADHD in the aetiology of BMI across the development. Conversely, BMI polygenic score association with ADHD phenotypes tended to decrease across the development.Addressing mixed evidence will require increased sample sizes to implement novel methods such as within-family MR.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors gratefully acknowledge the ongoing contribution of the participants in the Twins Early Development Study and their families. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The Twins Early Development Study is supported by grant MR/M021475/1 (and previously G0901245) from the UK Medical Research Council. J.-B.P. JBP is a fellow of MQ: Transforming Mental Health (MQ16IP16) and is supported by the Medical Research Foundation 2018 Emerging Leaders 1st Prize in Adolescent Mental Health. C.-Y.L. is supported by an Overseas Research Scholarship from University College London.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSummary statistics of the GWAS are publicly available and the TEDS data are available via data request. https://www.med.unc.edu/pgc/results-and-downloads https://zenodo.org/record/1251813#.Xph97C2ZNTZ https://www.ted.ac.uk.