PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Paolo Boffetta AU - Francesco Violante AU - Paolo Durando AU - Giuseppe De Palma AU - Enrico Pira AU - Luigi Vimercati AU - Alfonso Cristaudo AU - Giancarlo Icardi AU - Emma Sala AU - Maurizio Coggiola AU - Silvio Tafuri AU - Vittorio Gattini AU - Pietro Apostoli AU - Giovanna Spatari AU - Working Group on SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italian healthcare workers. TI - Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Italian healthcare workers: a multicenter study AID - 10.1101/2020.07.29.20158717 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.07.29.20158717 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/30/2020.07.29.20158717.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/30/2020.07.29.20158717.full AB - Background Healthcare workers (HCW) are at increased risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2, yet limited information is available on risk factors of infection.Methods We pooled data on occupational surveillance of 10,654 HCW who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in six Italian centers. Information was available on demographics, job title, department of employment, source of exposure, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and COVID-19-related symptoms. We fitted multivariable logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).Findings The prevalence of infection varied across centers and ranged from 3.0% to 22.0%, being strongly correlated with that of the respective areas. Women were at lower risk of infection compared to men. Fever, cough, dyspnea and malaise were the symptoms most strongly associated with infection, together with anosmia and ageusia. No differences in the risk of infection were detected between job titles, or working in a COVID-19 designated department. Reported contact with a patient inside or outside the workplace was a risk factor. Use of a mask was strongly protective against risk of infection as was use of gloves. The use of a mask by the source of exposure (patient or colleague) had an independent effect in reducing infection risk.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded with internal resources of the participating institutions.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was reviewed and considered exempt by the Ethics Committee of the University of Bologna. Informed consent was not deemed necessary by the Ethics Committee of the University of Bologna.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPrimary data have been uploaded on Dryad https://datadryad.org/stash/dashboard