TY - JOUR T1 - Examining Australian’s beliefs, misconceptions, and sources of information for COVID-19: A national online survey JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.07.27.20163204 SP - 2020.07.27.20163204 AU - Rae Thomas AU - Hannah Greenwood AU - Zoe A Michaleff AU - Eman Abukmail AU - Tammy Hoffmann AU - Kirsten McCaffery AU - Leah Hardiman AU - Paul Glasziou Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/29/2020.07.27.20163204.abstract N2 - Objective Public cooperation to practice preventive health behaviours is essential to manage the transmission of infectious diseases such as COVID-19. We aimed to investigate beliefs about COVID-19 diagnosis, transmission and prevention that have the potential to impact the uptake of recommended public health strategies.Design An online cross-sectional survey conducted May 8 to May 11 2020.Participants A national sample of 1500 Australian adults with representative quotas for age and gender provided by online panel provider.Main outcome measure Proportion of participants with correct/incorrect knowledge of COVID-19 preventive behaviours and reasons for misconceptions.Results Of the 1802 potential participants contacted, 289 were excluded, 13 declined, and 1500 participated in the survey (response rate 83%). Most participants correctly identified “washing your hands regularly with soap and water” (92%) and “staying at least 1.5m away from others” (90%) could help prevent COVID-19. Over 40% (incorrectly) considered wearing gloves outside of the home would prevent them contracting COVID-19. Views about face masks were divided. Only 66% of participants correctly identified that “regular use of antibiotics” would not prevent COVID-19.Most participants (90%) identified “fever, fatigue and cough” as indicators of COVID-19. However, 42% of participants thought that being unable to “hold your breath for 10 seconds without coughing” was an indicator of having the virus. The most frequently reported sources of COVID-19 information were commercial television channels (56%), the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (43%), and the Australian Government COVID-19 information app (31%).Conclusions Public messaging about hand hygiene and physical distancing to prevent transmission appear to have been effective. However, there are clear, identified barriers for many individuals that have the potential to impede uptake or maintenance of these behaviours in the long-term. Currently these non-drug interventions are our only effective strategy to combat this pandemic. Ensuring ongoing adherence to is critical.What is already known on this topicThe current strategies to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 are behavioural (hand hygiene, physical distancing, quarantining and testing if symptomatic) and rely on the public knowledge and subsequent practice of these strategies.Previous research has demonstrated a good level of public knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and preventive behaviours but a wide variation in practicing the recommended behaviours.Although knowledge can facilitate behaviour change, knowledge alone is insufficient to reliably change behaviour to the widespread extent require to combat health crises.What this study addsParticipants reveal confusion about whether wearing masks will reduce transmission, apprehension about attending health services, and perceptions that antibiotics and alternative remedies (such as essential oils) prevent transmission.Analysis of why participants hold these beliefs revealed two dominant themes: an incomplete or inaccurate understanding of how COVID-19 is transmitted, and the belief that the behaviours were unnecessary.This study underlines the necessity to not only target public messaging at effective preventative behaviours, but enhance behaviour change by clearly explaining why each behaviour is important.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementRT, HG and ZAM are supported by NHMRC Program grant (#1106452). TH is supported by a NHMRC Research Fellowship (#1154607). KM is supported NHMRC Research Fellowship (#1121110) PG is supported by a NHMRC Research Fellowship (#1080042).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Bond University Human Research Ethics Committee provided ethics approval for this research (#RT03008)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available upon request once manuscript is published. ER -