PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Roberto Valente AU - Stefano Di Domenico AU - Matteo Mascherini AU - Gregorio Santori AU - Francesco Papadia AU - Giovanni Orengo AU - Angelo Gratarola AU - Ferdinando Cafiero AU - Franco De Cian TI - A new model to prioritize and optimize access to elective surgery throughout the COVID-19 pandemic: A feasibility & pilot study AID - 10.1101/2020.07.21.20157719 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.07.21.20157719 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/26/2020.07.21.20157719.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/26/2020.07.21.20157719.full AB - We tested usability, safety, and ability to manage elective surgery flow of a multidisciplinary pathway adopting the SWALIS-2020 model in an interhospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. This pilot included 295 adults. The pathway prioritized, monitored and scheduled surgery in an 840.000-inhabitants area. Using the COVID-19-GOA-Sur-MDT-SWALIS-2020 model may be warranted.Structured abstract The COVID-19 outbreak burdens non-COVID elective surgery patients with figures similar to the SARS-Cov-2, by creating an overwhelming demand, increasing waiting times and costs. New tools are urgently needed to manage elective access. The study assesses the “SWALIS-2020” model’s ability to prioritize and optimize access to surgery during the pandemic.A 2020 March - May feasibility-pilot study, tested a software-aided, inter-hospital, multidisciplinary pathway. All specialties patients in the Genoa Departments referred for urgent elective surgery were included in a multidisciplinary pathway adopting a modified Surgical Waiting List InfoSystem (SWALIS) cumulative prioritization method (PAT-2020) based on waiting time and clinical urgency, in three subcategories: A1-15 days (certain rapid disease progression), A2-21 days (probable progression), and A3-30 days (potential progression).Following the feasibility study (N=55 patients), 240 referrals were evaluated in 4 weeks without major criticalities (M/F=73/167, Age=68.7±14.0). Waiting lists were prioritized and monitored, and theatres allocated based on demand. The SWALIS-2020 score (% of waited-against-maximum time) at operation was 88.7±45.2 at week 1 and then persistently over 100% (efficiency), over a controlled variation (equity), with a difference between A3 (153.29±103.52) vs. A1 (97.24 ± 107.93) (p <0.001), and A3 vs. A2 (88.05±77.51) (p<0.001). 222 patients underwent surgery, without related complications or delayed/failed discharges.The pathway has selected the very few patients with the greatest need, optimizing access even with +30% capacity weekly modifications. We will use the pathway to manage active, backlog, and hidden waiting lists throughout the further pandemic phases, and are looking for collaboration for multi-center research. https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN11384058.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialISRCTN11384058Funding StatementThe study has not received any external or ad hoc funding. Alisa contributed to maintaining the coherence of the study with institutional directives, and finally reviewing the manuscript. The corresponding author (RV) confirms that he had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Liguria Research Ethics CommitteeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are/will be available upon request from Mr Roberto Valente (Roberto.valente@hsanmartino.it) and Dr Stefano Di Domenico (Stefano.didomenico@hsanmartino.it). The dataset is in an MS Access TM format, and can be anonymized to any level required, as allowed by the Liguria Ethics Committee. The dataset will be made available 3 months after study completion, for 12 months, extendable. Any sharing request will be submitted to the Liguria Ethics Committee for approval.