TY - JOUR T1 - Regional differences in time off work after injury: a comparison of Australian states and territories within a single workers’ compensation system JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.07.23.20160416 SP - 2020.07.23.20160416 AU - Tyler J Lane AU - Luke Sheehan AU - Shannon Gray AU - Alex Collie Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/24/2020.07.23.20160416.abstract N2 - Background Time off work after workplace injury varies by compensation system. While often attributed to features of the compensation system, unaccounted regional factors may drive much of the effect. In this study, we compare disability durations by state and territory of residence within a single national workers’ compensation system. Large differences would indicate that factors other than compensation system settings are responsible for system effects observed in previous studies.Methods We applied crude and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to compare disability durations by state and territory of residence. Confounders included factors known to influence disability duration. Durations were left-censored at two weeks and right-censored at 104 weeks.Results We analysed N = 38,686 claims. In both crude and adjusted models, three of the seven states and territories significantly differed from the reference group, New South Wales. However, two of the three were different between crude and adjusted models. Regional effects were relatively small compared to other factors including insurer type, age, and type of injury.Conclusions Regional factors influence disability duration, which persist with adjustment for demographic, work, insurer type, and injury confounders. However, the effects are inconsistently significant and fairly small, especially when compared to the effect of confounders and system effects found in previous studies. Regional factors likely only account for a small share of the difference in disability duration between compensation systems.Competing Interest StatementThe authors previously received salary support from funding provided by the workers compensation systems investigated in this study.Funding StatementThis study was funded by an Australian Research Council Research Council Discovery Project grant (DP190102473), as part of the Compensation and Return to Work Effectiveness (ComPARE) Project, and by Safe Work Australia, a government statutory agency that develops national work health and safety and workers compensation policy. Professor Collie is supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT190100218).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study received ethics approval from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (CF14/2995, 2014001663).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesWe are unable to share the data given their sensitivity as case-level claims data. https://doi.org/10.26180/5f1933f8dcb6b ER -