Multi-stain modelling of histopathology slides for breast cancer prognosis prediction - Sharma, Abhinav; Gustafsson, Fredrik K.; Hartman, Johan; Rantalainen, Mattias (medRxiv, 2024)
Background Pathologic assessment of the established biomarkers using standard hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical (IHC) stained whole slide images (WSIs) is central in routine breast cancer diagnostics and contributes prognostic and predictive information that guides clinical decision-making. However, other than only aggregated protein-expression values from IHC WSIs, a spatial combination of histo-morphological information from IHC and H&E WSIs can potentially improve prognosis prediction in breast cancer patients. In this study, we aim to develop a deep learning-based risk-stratification method for breast cancer using routine H&E and IHC-stained histopathology WSIs from resected tumours.Methods This is a retrospective study including WSIs from surgical resected specimens from 945 patients from the South General Hospital in Stockholm. One H&E and four IHC (ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67) stained sections were included from each patient, retrieved from the same tumour block. The IHC WSIs with the H&E WSI were registered, and corresponding images patches (tiles) were extracted for each image modality. Features from the registered tiles were extracted using two existing and publicly available histopathology foundation models (UNI and CONCH). Using the extracted features together with time-to-event data, we optimised an attention-based multiple instance learning (MIL) model using the Cox loss (negative partial log-likelihood loss) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the survival endpoint.Results Using cross-validation we observed a prognostic performance with a C-index of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.56 - 0.72) for the risk score prediction using only H&E WSIs and UNI as the tile-level feature extractor. Combinations of H&E with one or more IHC modalities were subsequently evaluated, with the highest performance observed in the model combining the H&E and PR WSI data and the model combining all the stains, obtaining a C-index of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.65 - 0.79) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.64 - 0.79) respectively.Conclusion Multiple stain modalities are used in routine breast cancer pathology, but has not been considered together for prognostic modelling. The results in this study suggests that models combining morphological features extracted by histopathology foundation models across multiple stain modalities can improve prognostic risk-stratification performance compared to single-modality models.Competing Interest StatementJH has obtained speaker's honoraria or advisory board remunerations from Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, MSD and Gilead, and has received institutional research support from Cepheid, Novartis, Roche and AstraZeneca. MR and JH are co-founders and shareholders of Stratipath AB. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by funding from the Swedish Research Council, Swedish Cancer Society, Karolinska Institutet, ERA PerMed (ERAPERMED2019-224-ABCAP), VINNOVA and SweLIFE (SwAIPP project), MedTechLabs, Swedish e-science Research Centre (SeRC) - eCPC, Stockholm Region, Stockholm Cancer Society and Swedish Breast Cancer Association.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study has approval from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2017/2106-31, with amendments 2018/1462-32 and 2019-02336).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData cannot be made public due to local legislation since it contains sensitive patient data.