RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Oral Collagen for the treatment of Dermal Atrophy: A systematic review of human trials
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.15.20154120
DO 10.1101/2020.07.15.20154120
A1 Rhydian Howell-Morris
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/19/2020.07.15.20154120.abstract
AB BACKGROUND Dermal atrophy (DA) or skin “thinning” can cause a substantial impact on quality of life and, due to barrier function damage, further health problems including cutaneous infection, skin tears and lacerations from minor trauma, impaired wound healing and chronic dermal inflammation. Some dietary products are targeted at therapeutic and functional treatments for skin ageing (of which mild DA is a component); however, while dietary collagen is amongst the most popular, particularly in the form of collagen peptides (CPs), in contrast to reviews for both over-the-counter and under prescription topical treatments for DA (e.g. Tretinoin), there is no reviewed literature of human trials testing the efficacy of orally administered collagen treatments applicable to DA; hence this review.OBJECTIVE To review the literature and assess available randomised-controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of orally administered collagen treatments for any skin properties that relate to the pathophysiology of DA and suggest their potential for medical and general public use in treating DA.EVIDENCE REVIEW METHOD A PubMed search was conducted using “(collagen) AND (supplementation OR treatment) AND (skin OR dermis)”, after which titles and abstracts were screened to decide if they matched the inclusion criteria for review. Results were collected up to 1st of August 2019 and no lower limit on the year of publication was set.MAIN RESULTS Five studies with a total of 430 participants were included for review, with participants aged 24-70. Four out of the five studies used female only participants. The five studies used orally administered CPs, with dosage ranging from 570 mg/d to 10 g/d, running from 8 weeks to 6 months and assessed a range of skin properties relevant to DA including dermal thickness, epidermal thickness, dermal density, dermal collagen content, dermal collagen density and dermal elasticity. One of the studies combined CPs with several antioxidant ingredients to form the treatment and the remaining 4 studies used CPs as the only active ingredient. Methods to control for potential confounders were implemented in most studies including limiting exposure to sun, implementing a pre-treatment period of 1 week or more that controlled the use of cosmetics and intake of certain medications, micronutrient supplements and nutraceuticals with those restrictions continuing for the duration of the study. Given the heterogeneity of outcome measures across studies, quantitative analysis of results was not possible. In summary, the study with the antioxidant combined supplement showed a significant improvement in dermal thickness; two of the studies showed improvement in dermal collagen or pro-collagen content; three of the studies showed improvement in dermal elasticity; three studies showed improvement in dermal density or dermal collagen density; and lastly, no human study was found with the stated objective of assessing CPs effect specifically on DA.CONCLUSION Although definitive mechanistic cause-effect conclusions could not be drawn from the existing studies, they are supportive of beneficial effects of oral CP intake for treating characteristics of dermal atrophy. Further elucidation of the exact mode(s) of action that the CP intake has on improving dermal thickness, dermal density, and other skin biomarkers is necessary, with larger studies including more finely divided experimental and dose-response groups.In conclusion, rigorousness of the trials must be improved to establish a cause-effect relationship between the CP intake and the beneficial effects for the skin atrophy, however potential has been demonstrated.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSelf-funded, independent research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is secondary from primary studies cited within the review manuscript.