RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Immune response and endocytosis pathways are associated with the resilience against Alzheimer’s Disease
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19009464
DO 10.1101/19009464
A1 Tesi, Niccolò
A1 van der Lee, Sven J.
A1 Hulsman, Marc
A1 Jansen, Iris E.
A1 Stringa, Najada
A1 van Schoor, Natasja M.
A1 Scheltens, Philip
A1 van der Flier, Wiesje M.
A1 Huisman, Martijn
A1 Reinders, Marcel J. T.
A1 Holstege, Henne
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/16/19009464.abstract
AB Developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is influenced by multiple genetic variants that are involved in five major AD-pathways. Per individual, these pathways may differentially contribute to the modification of the AD-risk. The pathways involved in the resilience against AD have thus far been poorly addressed. Here, we investigated to what extent each molecular mechanism associates with (i) the increased risk of AD and (ii) the resilience against AD until extreme old age, by comparing pathway-specific polygenic risk scores (pathway-PRS). We used 29 genetic variants associated with AD to develop pathway-PRS for five major pathways involved in AD. We developed an integrative framework that allows multiple genes to associate with a variant, and multiple pathways to associate with a gene. We studied pathway-PRS in the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort of well-phenotyped AD patients (N=1,895), Dutch population controls from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (N=1,654) and our unique 100-plus Study cohort of cognitively healthy centenarians who avoided AD (N=293). Last, we estimated the contribution of each pathway to the genetic risk of AD in the general population. All pathway-PRS significantly associated with increased AD-risk and (in the opposite direction) with resilience against AD (except for angiogenesis, p<0.05). The pathway that contributed most to the overall modulation of AD-risk was β-amyloid metabolism (29.6%), which was driven mainly by APOE-variants. After excluding APOE variants, all pathway-PRS associated with increased AD-risk (except for angiogenesis, p<0.05), while specifically immune response (p=0.003) and endocytosis (p=0.0003) associated with resilience against AD. Indeed, the variants in these latter two pathways became the main contributors to the overall modulation of genetic risk of AD (45.5% and 19.2%, respectively). The genetic variants associated with the resilience against AD indicate which pathways are involved with maintained cognitive functioning until extreme ages. Our work suggests that a favorable immune response and a maintained endocytosis pathway might be involved in general neuro-protection, which highlight the need to investigate these pathways, next to β-amyloid metabolism.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe following studies and consortia have contributed to this manuscript. Amsterdam dementia cohort (ADC): Research of the Alzheimer center Amsterdam is part of the neurodegeneration research program of Amsterdam Neuroscience (www.amsterdamresearch.org). The Alzheimer Center Amsterdam is supported by Stichting Alzheimer Nederland and Stiching VUmc fonds. The clinical database structure was developed with funding from Stichting Dioraphte. Genotyping of the Dutch case-control samples was performed in the context of EADB (European Alzheimer DNA biobank) funded by the JPco-fuND FP-829-029 (ZonMW projectnumber 733051061). 100-plus study: we are grateful for the collaborative efforts of all participating centenarians and their family members and/or relatives. This work was supported by Stichting Alzheimer Nederland (WE09.2014-03), Stichting Diorapthe, horstingstuit foundation, Memorabel (ZonMW projectnumber 733050814) and Stichting VUmc Fonds. Genotyping of the 100-plus study was performed in the context of EADB (European Alzheimer DNA biobank) funded by the JPco-fuND FP-829-029 (ZonMW projectnumber 733051061). The clinical database structure was developed with funding from Stichting Dioraphte. Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) is largely supported by a grant from the Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, Directorate of Long-Term Care. The authors are grateful to all LASA participants, the fieldwork team and all researchers for their ongoing commitment to the study. This work was in part carried out on the Dutch national e-infrastructure with the support of SURF Cooperative. The authors declare no conflict of interests.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableWe provide in the supplements the estimates to construct pathway-specific polygenic risk scores with any genotype data. The genotype data that we used in this work are not publicly available. If interested, you may contact us. https://github.com/TesiNicco/pathway-PRS