TY - JOUR T1 - A Passive-State Comparison of Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography of the Biceps Brachii with a Robotic Measurement of Elbow Extension Impedance in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.07.15.20154658 SP - 2020.07.15.20154658 AU - Michael D. Ellis AU - Ninette T. A. Gerritsen AU - Netta Gurari AU - Sabrina M. Lee AU - Julius P. A. Dewald Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/16/2020.07.15.20154658.abstract N2 - Muscle tissue is prone to changes in composition and architecture following stroke. Changes in muscle tissue of the extremities are thought to increase passive muscle stiffness and joint impedance. These effects likely compound neuromuscular impairments exacerbating movement function. Unfortunately, conventional rehabilitation is devoid of quantitative measures yielding to subjective assessment of passive joint mobility and end feel. Shear wave ultrasound elastography is a conventional tool used by ultrasonographers that may be readily available for use in the rehabilitation setting as a quantitative measure, albeit at the muscle-tissue level, filling the gap. To support this postulation, we evaluated the criterion validity of shear wave ultrasound elastography of the biceps brachii by investigating the relationship to a laboratory-based criterion measure for quantifying elbow joint impedance in individuals with moderate to severe chronic stroke. Measurements were performed under passive conditions at seven positions spanning the arc of elbow joint extension in both arms of twelve individuals with hemiparetic stroke. Surface electromyography was utilized for threshold-based confirmation of muscle quiescence. A significant moderate relationship was identified near end range of elbow extension and all metrics were greater in the paretic arm. Data supports the progression toward clinical application of shear wave ultrasound elastography in evaluating altered muscle mechanical properties in stroke stipulating the confirmation of muscle quiescence. Considering the lack of bedside robotics in clinical practice, shear wave ultrasound elastography will likely augment the conventional method of manually testing joint mobility. Tissue-level measurement may also assist in identifying new therapeutic targets for patient-specific impairment-based interventions.New & Noteworthy Methods for quantifying passive (non-reflex mediated) joint mobility are absent in stroke rehabilitation. Rehabilitation specialists are left to subjective assessment of the impact on function. Here, we compare the application of shear wave ultrasound elastography for estimating mechanical properties of muscle with a robotic method (criterion measure) of measuring passive elbow extension joint impedance. Data support the clinical application of shear wave ultrasound elastography, especially with the absence of bedside robotics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R01 Grant (HD 84009: PIs-Dewald/Murray, CoI-Ellis) and K25 Grant (HD096116; PI: Gurari).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Prior to the experiment, all participants gave informed consent to participate in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Northwestern University in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki for research involving human subjects.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesProcessed data are available upon request from the corresponding author following printed publication of the manuscript. ER -