RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Work Related and Personal Predictors of Covid 19 transmission
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.07.13.20152819
DO 10.1101/2020.07.13.20152819
A1 Anand, Paul
A1 Allen, Heidi
A1 Ferrer, Robert
A1 Gold, Natalie
A1 Gonzales Martinez, Rolando Manuel
A1 Kontopantelis, Evangelos
A1 Krause, Melanie
A1 Vergunst, Francis
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/15/2020.07.13.20152819.abstract
AB The paper provides new evidence from a survey of 2000 individuals in the US and UK related to predictors of Covid-19 transmission. Specifically, it investigates work and personal predictors of transmission experience reported by respondents using regression models to better understand possible transmission pathways and mechanisms in the community. Three themes emerge from the analysis. Firstly, transport roles and travelling practices are significant predictors of infection. Secondly, evidence from the US especially shows union membership, consultation over safety measures and the need to use public transport to get to work are also significant predictors. This is interpreted as evidence of the role of deprivation and of reactive workplace consultations. Thirdly and finally, there is some, often weaker, evidence that income, car-owership, use of a shared kitchen, university degree type, risk-aversion, extraversion and height are predictors of transmission. The comparative nature of the evidence indicates that the less uniformly stringent nature of the US lockdown provides more information about both structural and individual factors that predict transmission. The evidence about height is discussed in the context of the aerosol transmission debate. The paper concludes that both structural and individual factors must be taken into account when predicting transmission or designing effective public health measures and messages to prevent or contain transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAll funding from internal university sources. No external funding to report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:HREC/3590 The Open UniversityAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available via a link in the supplementary materials