PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Chernozhukov, Victor
AU  - Kasahara, Hiroyuki
AU  - Schrimpf, Paul
TI  - Causal Impact Of Masks, Policies, Behavior On Early Covid-19 Pandemic in the U.S
AID  - 10.1101/2020.05.27.20115139
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.05.27.20115139
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/13/2020.05.27.20115139.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/13/2020.05.27.20115139.full
AB  - This paper evaluates the dynamic impact of various policies adopted by US states on the growth rates of confirmed Covid-19 cases and deaths as well as social distancing behavior measured by Google Mobility Reports, where we take into consideration people’s voluntarily behavioral response to new information of transmission risks. Our analysis finds that both policies and information on transmission risks are important determinants of Covid-19 cases and deaths and shows that a change in policies explains a large fraction of observed changes in social distancing behavior. Our counterfactual experiments suggest that nationally mandating face masks for employees on April 1st could have reduced the growth rate of cases and deaths by more than 10 percentage points in late April, and could have led to as much as 17 to 55 percent less deaths nationally by the end of May, which roughly translates into 17 to 55 thousand saved lives. Our estimates imply that removing non-essential business closures (while maintaining school closures, restrictions on movie theaters and restaurants) could have led to -20 to 60 percent more cases and deaths by the end of May. We also find that, without stay-at-home orders, cases would have been larger by 25 to 170 percent, which implies that 0.5 to 3.4 million more Americans could have been infected if stay-at-home orders had not been implemented. Finally, we find considerable uncertainty over the effects of removing all policies because the timing of school closures had little cross-sectional variation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding for this manuscript has been received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not Applicable.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in this manuscript is available in public domain as stated in the data appendix of the manuscript.