TY - JOUR T1 - Social contact and inequalities in depression and loneliness among older adults: A mediation analysis of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.07.01.20143990 SP - 2020.07.01.20143990 AU - Michael J Green AU - Elise Whitley AU - Claire L Niedzwiedz AU - Richard J Shaw AU - S Vittal Katikireddi Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/10/2020.07.01.20143990.abstract N2 - Background Social contact, including remote contact (by telephone, email, letter or text), could help reduce social inequalities in depression and loneliness among older adults.Methods Data were from the 8th wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (2016/17), stratified by age (n=1,635 aged <65; n=4,123 aged 65+). Inverse probability weighting was used to estimate average effects of weekly in-person and remote social contact on depression (score of 3+ on 8-item CES-D scale) and two measures of loneliness (sometimes/often feels lonely vs hardly ever/never; and top quintile of UCLA loneliness scale vs all others). We also estimated controlled direct effects of education, partner status, and wealth on loneliness and depression under two scenarios: 1) universal infrequent (<weekly) in-person social contact; and 2) universal weekly remote social contact.Results Weekly in-person social contact was associated with reduced odds of depression and loneliness, but associations with remote social contact were weak. Lower education raised odds of depression and loneliness, but differences were attenuated with infrequent in-person contact. Respondents living alone experienced more depression and loneliness than those living with a partner, and less wealth was associated with more depression. With universal infrequent in-person contact, these differences narrowed among those aged under 65 but widened among those aged 65+. Universal weekly remote contact had little impact on inequalities.Conclusions Reduced in-person social contact may increase depression and loneliness among older adults, especially for those aged 65+ who live alone. Reliance on remote social contact seems unlikely to compensate for social inequalities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the UK Medical Research Council (grant numbers MC_UU_12017/13, MC_PC_17217, MR/R024774/1 to CN), the Scottish Government Chief Scientist Office (SPHSU13), and National Health Service Research Scotland (SCAF/15/02 to SVK).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for all the ELSA waves was granted from NHS Research Ethics Committees under the National Research and Ethics Service (NRES).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData were from the 8th wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and are available for use from the UK Data Service archive. https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/studies/study?id=5050 ER -