PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Faiq I Gorial AU - Sabeeh Mashhadani AU - Hend M Sayaly AU - Basim Dhawi Dakhil AU - Marwan M. AlMashhadani AU - Adnan M Aljabory AU - Hassan M Abbas AU - Mohammed Ghanim AU - Jawad I Rasheed TI - Effectiveness of Ivermectin as add-on Therapy in COVID-19 Management (Pilot Trial) AID - 10.1101/2020.07.07.20145979 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.07.07.20145979 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/08/2020.07.07.20145979.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/08/2020.07.07.20145979.full AB - Background To date no effective therapy has been demonstrated for COVID-19. In vitro, studies indicated that ivermectin (IVM) has antiviral effect.Objectives To assess the effectiveness of ivermectin (IVM) as add-on therapy to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZT) in treatment of COVID-19.Methods This Pilot clinical trial conducted on hospitalized adult patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 diagnosed according to WHO interim guidance. Sixteen Patients received a single dose of IVM 200Mcg /kg on admission day as add on therapy to hydroxychloroquine (HCQ)and Azithromycin (AZT) and were compared with 71 controls received HCQ and AZT matched in age, gender, clinical features, and comorbidities.The primary outcome was percentage of cured patients, defined as symptoms free to be discharged from the hospital and 2 consecutive negative PCR test from nasopharyngeal swabs at least 24 hours apart. The secondary outcomes were time to cure in both groups and evaluated by measuring time from admission of the patient to the hospital till discharge.Results Of 87 patients included in the study,t he mean age ± SD (range) of patients in the IVM group was similar to controls [44.87 ± 10.64 (28-60) vs 45.23 ± 18.47 (8-80) years, p=0.78] Majority of patients in both groups were male but statistically not significant [11(69%) versus 52 (73%), with male: female ratio 2.21 versus 2.7-, p=0.72)All the patients of IVM group were cured compared with the controls [16 (100 %) vs 69 (97.2 %)]. Two patients died in the controls. The mean time to stay in the hospital was significantly lower in IVM group compared with the controls (7.62 ± 2.75 versus 13.22 ±5.90 days, p=0.00005, effect size= 0.82). No adverse events were observedConclusions Add-on use of IVM to HCQ and AZT had better effectiveness, shorter hospital stay, and relatively safe compared with controls. however, a larger prospective study with longer follow up may be needed to validate these results.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04343092Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the IRB of Baghdad Teaching Hospital of The General Directorate of Medical CityAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available when required