TY - JOUR T1 - Motor and Activity Psychosis-Risk (MAP-R) Scale: An exploration of scale structure with replication and validation JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.07.02.20145482 SP - 2020.07.02.20145482 AU - Katherine S. F. Damme AU - Jason Schiffman AU - Lauren M. Ellman AU - Vijay A. Mittal Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/08/2020.07.02.20145482.abstract N2 - Background Motor abnormalities precede and predict the onset of psychosis. Despite the practical utility of motor abnormalities for early identification, prediction, and individualized medicine applications, there is currently no dedicated self-report instrument designed to capture these important behaviors. The current study assessed and validated a questionnaire designed for use in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR).Methods The current study included both exploratory (n=3,009) and validation(n=439) analytic datasets– that included individuals at CHR (n=84)-who completed the novel Motor Abnormalities and Psychosis-Risk (MAP-R) Scale, clinical interviews and a finger tapping task. The structure of the scale and reliability of items were consistent across two analytic datasets. The resulting scales were assessed for discriminant validity across CHR, community sample non-psychiatric volunteer, and clinical groups.Results The scale showed a consistent structure across independent data points across two analytic datasets subscale structure. The resultant subscale structure was consistent with conceptual models of motor pathology in psychosis (coordination and dyskinesia) in both the exploratory and the validation analytic dataset. Further, these subscales showed discriminant, predictive and convergent validity. The motor abnormality scales discriminated CHR from community sample non-psychiatric controls and clinical samples. Finally, these subscales predicted to risk calculator scores and showed convergent validity with motor performance on a finger tapping task.Conclusion The MAP-R scale demonstrated good internal validity, discriminant validity, predictive validity, and convergent validity, and subscales map on to conceptually relevant motor circuits. This scale showed great promise in characterizing a novel area of detection of psychosis risk.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Mental Health (MH094650, MH112545, MH103231, MH094650, VM; 5R01MH112613-03, 3R01MH112613-02S1, and 5R01MH112613-02, LME; 5R01MH112612-03, 5R01MH112612-02, and 1R01MH112612-01). We have no conflicts to disclose.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The procedures were approved by the Temple University IRB.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available upon request to PIs. ER -