PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Dennis Shung AU - Cynthia Tsay AU - Loren Laine AU - Prem Thomas AU - Caitlin Partridge AU - Michael Simonov AU - Allen Hsiao AU - Andrew Taylor TI - Early Identification of Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding using Electronic Health Record Phenotyping AID - 10.1101/2020.07.06.20136374 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.07.06.20136374 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/07/2020.07.06.20136374.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/07/2020.07.06.20136374.full AB - Background and Aim Guidelines recommend risk stratification scores in patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), but such scores are uncommonly employed in practice. Automation and deployment of risk stratification scores in real time within electronic health records (EHRs) would overcome a major impediment. This requires an automated mechanism to accurately identify (“phenotype”) patients with GIB at the time of presentation. The goal is to identify patients with acute GIB by developing and evaluating EHR-based phenotyping algorithms for emergency department (ED) patients.Methods We specified criteria using structured data elements to create rules for identifying patients, and also developed a natural-language-processing (NLP)-based algorithm for automated phenotyping of patients, tested them with tenfold cross-validation (n=7144) and external validation (n=2988), and compared them with the standard method for encoding patient conditions in the EHR, Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED). The gold standard for GIB diagnosis was independent dual manual review of medical records. The primary outcome was positive predictive value (PPV).Results A decision rule using GIB-specific terms from ED triage and from ED review-of-systems assessment performed better than SNOMED on internal validation (PPV=91% [90%-93%] vs. 74% [71%-76%], P<0.001) and external validation (PPV=85% [84%-87%] vs. 69% [67%-71%], P<0.001). The NLP algorithm (external validation PPV=80% [79-82%]) was not superior to the structured-datafields decision rule.Conclusions An automated decision rule employing GIB-specific triage and review-of-systems terms can be used to trigger EHR-based deployment of risk stratification models to guide clinical decision-making in real time for patients with acute GIB presenting to the ED.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementDS is supported by NIH grant T32 DK007017.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board of Yale University, Human Investigation Committee HIC # 1408014519All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll patient data is stored on encrypted and password-secured storage and is not publicly available to preserve patient privacy.