TY - JOUR T1 - The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: a rapid systematic review JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.07.03.20145607 SP - 2020.07.03.20145607 AU - Ashley Elizabeth Muller AU - Elisabet Vivianne Hafstad AU - Jan Peter William Himmels AU - Geir Smedslund AU - Signe Flottorp AU - Synne Øien Stensland AU - Stijn Stroobants AU - Stijn van de Velde AU - Gunn Elisabeth Vist Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/04/2020.07.03.20145607.abstract N2 - Background The covid-19 pandemic has heavily burdened, and in some cases overwhelmed, healthcare systems throughout the world. Healthcare workers are not only at heightened risk of infection, but also of adverse mental health outcomes. Identification of organizational, collegial and individual risk and resilience factors impacting the mental health of healthcare workers are needed to inform preparedness planning and sustainable response.Methods We performed a rapid systematic review to identify, assess and summarize available research on the mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers. On 11 May 2020, we utilized the Norwegian Institute of Public Health’s Live map of covid-19 evidence, the visualization of a database of 20,738 screened studies, to identify studies for inclusion. We included studies reporting on any type of mental health outcome in any type of healthcare workers during the pandemic. We described interventions reported by the studies, and narratively summarized mental health-related outcomes, as study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. We assessed study quality using design-specific instruments.Results We included 59 studies, reporting on a total of 54,707 healthcare workers. The prevalence of general psychological distress across the studies ranged from 7-97% (median 37%), anxiety 9-90% (median 24%), depression 5-51% (median 21%), and sleeping problems 34-65% (median 37%). Seven studies reported on implementing mental health interventions, and most focused on individual symptom reduction, but none reported on effects of the interventions. In most studies, healthcare workers reported low interest in and use of professional help, and greater reliance on social support and contact with family and friends. Exposure to covid-19 was the most commonly reported correlate of mental health problems, followed by female gender, and worry about infection or about infecting others. Social support correlated with less mental health problems.Discussion Healthcare workers in a variety of fields, positions, and exposure risks are reporting anxiety, depression, sleep problems, and distress during the covid-19 pandemic, but most studies do not report comparative data on mental health symptoms. before the pandemic. There seems to be a mismatch between risk factors for adverse mental health outcomes among healthcare workers in the current pandemic and their needs and preferences, and the individual psychopathology focus of current interventions. Efforts to help healthcare workers sustain healthy relationships to colleagues, family and friends over time may be paramount to safeguard what is already an important source of support during the prolonged crisis. Expanding interventions’ focus to incorporate organizational, collegial and family factors to support healthcare workers responding to the pandemic could improve acceptability and efficacy of interventions.Other The protocol for this review is available online. No funding was received.Summary boxWhat is already known on this topicWhat is already known on this topicDuring viral outbreaks such as covid-19, healthcare providers are at increased risk of infection and negative physical and mental health outcomesCovid-19 is a particular challenge to healthcare systems and workersWhat this study addsWhat this study addsHealthcare workers’ mental health problems correlate with organizational factors such as workload and exposure to covid-19 patientsHealthcare workers are more interested in occupational protection, rest, and social support than in professional psychological helpInterventions focus more on addressing individual psychopathology, which points towards a mismatch between what workers want and need, and the services available to themCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.fhi.no/contentassets/02def24ce1934fa5942d55cac533a005/hcw-mental-health-protocol.pdf Funding StatementNo funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No ethical approval was required for this systematic review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSecondary data analyzed in this review may be available upon reasonable request. ER -