PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - PM De Salazar
AU  - D Gómez-Barroso
AU  - D Pampaka
AU  - JM Gil
AU  - B Peñalver
AU  - C Fernández-Escobar
AU  - M Lipsitch
AU  - A Larrauri
AU  - E Goldstein
AU  - MA Hernán
TI  - Lockdown measures and relative changes in the age-specific incidence of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.30.20143560
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.30.20143560
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/02/2020.06.30.20143560.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/02/2020.06.30.20143560.full
AB  - Background The first months of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in Spain resulted in high incidence and mortality. A national sero-epidemiological survey suggests higher cumulative incidence of infection in older individuals than in younger individuals. However, little is known about the epidemic dynamics in different age groups, including the relative effect of the lockdown measures introduced on March 15, and strengthened on March 30 to April 14, 2020 when only essential workers continued to work.Methods We used data from the National Epidemiological Surveillance Network (RENAVE in Spanish) on the daily number of reported COVID-19 cases (by date of symptom onset) in eleven 5-year age groups: 15-19y through 65-69y. For each age group g, we computed the proportion E(g) of individuals in age group g among all reported cases aged 15-69y during the pre-lockdown period (March 1-10, 2020) and the corresponding proportion L(g) during two lockdown periods (March 25-April 3 and April 8-17, 2020). For each lockdown period, we computed the proportion ratios PR(g)= L(g)/E(g). For each pair of age groups g1,g2, PR(g1)>PR(g2) implies a relative increase in the incidence of detected SARS-CoV-2 infection in the age group g1 compared with g2 for the later vs. early period.Results For the first lockdown period, the highest PR values were in age groups 50-54y (PR=1.21; 95% CI: 1.12,1.30) and 55-59y (PR=1.19; 1.11,1.27). For the second lockdown period, the highest PR values were in age groups 15-19y (PR=1.26; 0.95,1.68) and 50-54y (PR=1.20; 1.09,1.31).Conclusions Our results suggest that different outbreak control measures led to different changes in the relative incidence by age group. During the first lockdown period, when non-essential work was allowed, individuals aged 40-64y, particularly those aged 50-59y presented with higher COVID-19 relative incidence compared to pre-lockdown period, while younger adults/older adolescents (together with persons aged 50-59y) had increased relative incidence during the later, strengthened lockdown. The role of different age groups during the epidemic should be considered when implementing future mitigation efforts.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementP.M.D was supported by the Fellowship Foundation Ramon Areces. M.L and E.G. were supported by Award Number U54GM088558 from the US National Institute Of General Medical Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Centro Nacional de Epidemiologia, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.Data was obtained from the National Epidemiological Surveillance Network (RENAVE) through the Web platform SiViEsAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNA