TY - JOUR T1 - Improving maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes through a community-based women’s health education program (<em>Chamas for Change</em>): a cluster randomized controlled trial JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.06.28.20141663 SP - 2020.06.28.20141663 AU - Lauren Y. Maldonado AU - Jeffrey Bone AU - Michael L. Scanlon AU - Gertrude Anusu AU - Sheilah Chelagat AU - Anjellah Jumah AU - Justus E. Ikemeri AU - Julia J. Songok AU - Astrid Christoffersen-Deb AU - Laura J. Ruhl Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/29/2020.06.28.20141663.abstract N2 - Introduction Community-based women’s health education groups may improve maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH); however, evidence from sub-Saharan Africa is lacking. Chamas for Change (Chamas) is a community health volunteer (CHV)-led health education program for pregnant and postpartum women in western Kenya. We evaluated Chamas’ effect on facility-based deliveries and other MNCH outcomes.Methods We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial involving 74 communities in Trans Nzoia County. We included pregnant women who presented to health facilities for their first antenatal care visits by 32 weeks gestation. We randomized community clusters 1:1 without stratification or matching; we masked data collectors, investigators, and analysts to allocation. Intervention clusters were invited to bimonthly, group-based, CHV-led health lessons (Chamas); control clusters had monthly CHV home-visits (standard of care). The primary outcome was facility-based delivery at 12-months follow-up. We conducted an intention-to-treat approach with multilevel logistic regression models using individual-level data. We prospectively registered this trial with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03187873).Results Between November 27, 2017 and March 8, 2018, we enrolled 1920 participants from 37 intervention and 37 control clusters. A total of 1550 (80.7%) participants completed the study with 822 (82.5%) and 728 (78.8%) in the intervention and control arms, respectively. Facility-based deliveries improved in the intervention arm (80.9% vs 73.0%; Risk Difference (RD) 7.4%, 95% CI 3.0-12.5, OR=1.58, 95% CI 0.97-2.55, p=0.057). Chamas participants also demonstrated higher rates of 48-hour postpartum visits (RD 15.3%, 95% CI 12.0-19.6), exclusive breastfeeding (RD 11.9%, 95% CI 7.2-16.9), contraceptive adoption (RD 7.2%, 95% CI 2.6-12.9), and infant immunization completion (RD 15.6%, 95% CI 11.5-20.9).Conclusion Chamas participation was associated with significantly improved MNCH outcomes compared with the standard of care. This trial contributes robust data from sub-Saharan Africa to support community-based, women’s health education groups for MNCH in resource-limited settings.What is already known?Globally, maternal and infant deaths have declined over the last three decades; however, low and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Kenya, still disproportionately incur the highest morbidity and mortality.The World Health Organization recommends leveraging lay health workers (LHWs), including community health volunteers (CHVs), to promote maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) in resource-limited settings.Prior research suggests coupling strategies that promote community-based approaches (i.e. integrating LHWs) and women’s health education and support groups during pregnancy and postpartum may improve MNCH; however, robust evidence from sub-Saharan Africa is lacking.What are the new findings?Using a cluster randomized controlled trial design, we found that participation in Chamas for Change (Chamas) – a group-based women’s health education program led by CHVs – was associated with significantly improved MNCH outcomes, including facility-based deliveries, compared with the standard of care (i.e. monthly home-visits) in rural Kenya.This trial also demonstrated significant associations between program participation and receiving 48 hour postpartum home-visits, breastfeeding exclusively, adopting a contraceptive method postpartum, and immunizing infants fully by 12 months of life as compared to the standard of care.These findings support pilot data from a preceding evaluation of the Chamas program as well as the current literature on community-based interventions delivered by LHWs to promote MNCH in other resource-limited settings.What do the new findings imply?Effective community-based strategies that build upon existing infrastructure to promote MNCH are needed to continue to improve the health and well-being of women and infants in rural sub-Saharan Africa and other LMICs.Chamas offers an innovative approach to improve MNCH in resource-limited settings with significant health policy implications; collective evidence from this trial and preceding studies support community-based women’s health education groups as an effective strategy for improving uptake of facility-based deliveries and other life-saving MNCH practices.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03187873)Funding StatementThis trial was made possible through the generous support of the Saving Lives at Birth (SL@B) partnership. The authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the views, decisions, or policies of the SL@B partners or the institutions with which they are affiliated. The authors and their respective institutions did not receive payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We received ethics approvals from the Institutional Research Ethics Committee at Moi University and Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital (IREC/2018/269) and Institutional Review Board at Indiana University (1905296355). We obtained written informed consent from all participants prior to data collection.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe de-identified data set and a data dictionary will be made available upon reasonable request with publication of the trial. Inquiries can be made to the corresponding author of this manuscript (Dr. Lauren Y. Maldonado, lymaldonado{at}mgh.harvard.edu). ER -