RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Prism Adaptation-Induced Modulation of Cortical Excitability of Upper and Lower Limb Muscles is Enhanced with Electrical Stimulation JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2024.09.30.24314639 DO 10.1101/2024.09.30.24314639 A1 Aloba, Fisayo K A1 Hope, Jasmine M A1 Spencer, Jacob A1 Muthukumar, Maithri A1 Leone, Taylor M A1 Parikh, Vyoma A1 Chen, Peii A1 Borich, Michael R A1 Kesar, Trisha M YR 2024 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/10/01/2024.09.30.24314639.abstract AB Background Prism adaptation (PA) is a behavioral training paradigm shown to induce immediate changes in visuospatial and motor function. PA may modulate the input and output stages of processing spatial cognitive information. However, the cortical plasticity mechanisms related to the behavioral effects of PA are poorly understood. Non-invasive sensorimotor electrical stimulation (Stim) may upregulate corticomotor excitability and is commonly used as a therapeutic adjunct during motor training.Objective To evaluate the effects of combining PA with Stim on corticomotor excitability and visuo-spatial-motor behavior.Methods We used a repeated-measures design to evaluate the effects of 1 session of PA with and without Stim in 15 young able-bodied individuals (18-35 years). Corticomotor output, intracortical inhibition, and facilitation were evaluated before and after PA with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited from single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) delivered to M1 hotspots of bilateral upper and left lower limbs.Results Behaviorally, both PA+Stim and PA+Sham showed significant sensorimotor aftereffects (visuo-spatial and proprioceptive pointing). Neurophysiologically, suprathreshold MEP amplitude increased in the left first dorsal interossei, left tibialis anterior, and left soleus following the PA+Stim condition compared to the PA+Sham condition. Additionally, following PA+Stim, Short Interval Intra-Cortical Inhibition (SICI) increased in the left tibialis anterior and left soleus.Conclusion Although both PA+Stim and PA+Sham had similar behavioral aftereffects, only PA+Stim increased cortical excitability in M1 representations of the left upper and lower limb (toward the direction of the PA aftereffect), suggesting that PA+Stim may elicit greater neurophysiological changes than PA alone.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT06053320Funding StatementThis study was funded by: NIH NINDS T32NS096050; NIH NINDS 1F31NS131020 and NIH NINDS L30NS139361Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Emory University Atlanta, GA gave ethical approval for this work. IRB ID: STUDY00005012I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors