RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Patients’ accounts of living with and managing Inflammatory Bowel Disease in rural Southern New Zealand: a qualitative study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.25.20133421
DO 10.1101/2020.06.25.20133421
A1 Lauralie Richard
A1 Geoff Noller
A1 Sarah Derrett
A1 Trudy Sullivan
A1 Fiona Doolan-Noble
A1 Andrew McCombie
A1 Michael Schultz
A1 Christine Ho
A1 Tim Stokes
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/26/2020.06.25.20133421.abstract
AB Objective To explore how adults living with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) in rural New Zealand manage their condition and engage with health care providers.Design Qualitative exploratory design with semi-structured interviews analysed thematically.Setting and participants Interviews were conducted with 18 people living with IBD in the Otago region of the South Island.Results Five important constructs were identified: 1. Journey to confirming and accepting diagnosis; 2. Importance of the relationship with the health care team; 3. Support from others; 4. Learning how to manage IBD; and 5. Care at a distance - experiences of rurality. Pathways to confirming diagnosis involved two contrasting journeys: a long and slow process where diagnosis remained unclear for a prolonged period, and a more acute process where diagnosis typically came as a shock. Central to the acceptance process was acknowledging the chronicity of the condition, which involved feelings of grief but also the fear of judgement and stigma. Building a strong relationship with the specialist was central to medical management, particularly in the initial stage following diagnosis. Support from others was critical, enabling participants to progress through acceptance of the disease and developing confidence in its everyday management. Participants shared different strategies on how to manage IBD, describing a “trial and error” process of “finding what’s right” at different stages of the condition. Managing IBD rurally involved challenges of access to specialist care, with perceptions of delayed referrals and concerns about disparities in specialist access compared to urban counterparts. Rural living also had financial implications - cost of time and cost of mobilising resources for long travels to the urban centre for treatments.Conclusions Findings from this study provide a rich understanding of the complex health journeys of people living with IBD and the challenges of managing the condition rurally.View this table:Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Health Care Otago Charitable Trust. The funding body had no involvement in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Otago Human Ethics Committee (D18/145).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFull de-identified interview transcripts will not be shared. Informed consent, in line with the approving ethics committee, only allows for the use of de-identified extracts within research reporting and writing, in order to maintain the privacy of participants based in a defined regional area and population, thus making their identification with full transcripts more likely.