PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Vadim A. Karatayev AU - Madhur Anand AU - Chris T. Bauch TI - The far side of the COVID-19 epidemic curve: local re-openings and re-closings based on globally coordinated triggers may work best AID - 10.1101/2020.05.10.20097485 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.05.10.20097485 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/25/2020.05.10.20097485.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/25/2020.05.10.20097485.full AB - In the late stages of an epidemic, infections are often sporadic and geographically distributed. Spatially structured stochastic models can capture these important features of disease dynamics, thereby allowing a broader exploration of interventions. Here we develop a stochastic model of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission amongst an interconnected group of population centres representing counties, municipalities and districts (collectively, “counties”). The model is parameterized with demographic, epidemiological, testing, and travel data from Ontario, Canada. We explore the effects of different control strategies after the epidemic curve has been flattened. We compare a local strategy of re-opening (and re-closing, as needed) schools and workplaces county-by-county according to triggers for county-specific infection prevalence, to a global strategy of province-wide re-opening and re-closing according to triggers for province-wide infection prevalence. We find that the local strategy results in a similar number coronavirus disease (COVID-19) cases but significantly fewer person-days of closure, even under high inter-county travel scenarios. However, both cases and person-days lost to closure rise when county triggers are not coordinated and when testing rates vary among counties. Finally, we show that local strategies can also do better in the early epidemic stage but only if testing rates are high and the trigger prevalence is low. Our results suggest that pandemic planning for the far side of the COVID-19 epidemic curve should consider local strategies for re-opening and re-closing.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by NSERC Discovery Grants to CTB and MA. The funder had no role in the research.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe model simulation code is available upon request. All other data used in the model are publicly available.