PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Mazzotta, Valentina AU - Piselli, Pierluca AU - Lepri, Alessandro Cozzi AU - Matusali, Giulia AU - Cimini, Eleonora AU - Esvan, Rozenn AU - Colavita, Francesca AU - Gagliardini, Roberta AU - Notari, Stefania AU - Oliva, Alessandra AU - Meschi, Silvia AU - Casetti, Rita AU - Micheli, Giulia AU - Bordi, Licia AU - Giacinta, Alessandro AU - Grassi, Germana AU - Tekle, Saba Gebremeskel AU - Cimaglia, Claudia AU - Paulicelli, Jessica AU - Caioli, Alessandro AU - Gallì, Paola AU - Duca, Giulia Del AU - Lichtner, Miriam AU - Sarmati, Loredana AU - Tamburrini, Enrica AU - Mastroianni, Claudio AU - Latini, Alessandra AU - Faccendini, Paolo AU - Fontana, Carla AU - Nicastri, Emauele AU - Siddu, Andrea AU - Barca, Alessandra AU - Vaia, Francesco AU - Girardi, Enrico AU - Maggi, Fabrizio AU - Antinori, Andrea AU - MPOX Vaccine Lazio Study Group TI - Reactogenicity and immunogenicity against MPXV of the intradermal administration of Modified Vaccinia Ankara compared to the standard subcutaneous route AID - 10.1101/2024.09.17.24313609 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.09.17.24313609 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/18/2024.09.17.24313609.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/18/2024.09.17.24313609.full AB - The recent resurgence of Mpox in central Africa has been declared again a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) requiring coordinated international responses. Vaccination is a priority to expand protection and enhance control strategies, but the vaccine’s need exceeds the currently available doses. Intradermal administration of one-fifth of the standard Modified-Vaccinia-Ankara (MVA-BN) dose was temporarily authorized during the 2022 PHEIC. Studies conducted before 2022 provided evidence about the humoral response against the Vaccinia virus (VACV) after vaccination but not against the Mpox virus (MPXV). Moreover, no data are available on the T-cell response elicited by MVA-BN administered subcutaneously or intradermally. Here, we compare the two vaccine administration routes according to reactogenicity and immunogenicity based on data from 943 vaccine recipients during the 2022 vaccination campaign in Rome, Italy. We found that the intradermal route elicited slightly higher titers of MPXV-specific IgG and nAbs than the subcutaneous one. At the same time, no differences in cellular response were detected. MVA-BN was globally well tolerated despite higher reactogenicity for the intradermal than the subcutaneous route, especially for the reactions at the local injection site. The intradermal dose-sparing strategy was proven safe and immunogenic and would make vaccination available to more people.Competing Interest StatementAA received a grant from Bavarian Nordic for participation in conferences. The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported by the National Institute for Infectious Disease Lazzaro Spallanzani <IRCCS Advanced grant 5x1000, 2021> and by the Italian Ministry of Health <Ricerca Corrente Linea 2> INMI Spallanzani IRCCSAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The INMI Lazzaro Spallanzani Ethical Committee gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.