PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lian, Yi AU - Jiang, Xiaoqian AU - Long, Qi TI - Federated Multiple Imputation for Variables that Are Missing Not At Random in Distributed Electronic Health Records AID - 10.1101/2024.09.15.24313479 DP - 2024 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2024.09.15.24313479 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/16/2024.09.15.24313479.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/16/2024.09.15.24313479.full AB - Large electronic health records (EHR) have been widely implemented and are available for research activities. The magnitude of such databases often requires storage and computing infrastructure that are distributed at different sites. Restrictions on data-sharing due to privacy concerns have been another driving force behind the development of a large class of distributed and/or federated machine learning methods. While missing data problem is also present in distributed EHRs, albeit potentially more complex, distributed multiple imputation (MI) methods have not received as much attention. An important advantage of distributed MI, as well as distributed analysis, is that it allows researchers to borrow information across data sites, mitigating potential fairness issues for minority groups that do not have enough volume at certain sites. In this paper, we propose a communication-efficient and privacy-preserving distributed MI algorithms for variables that are missing not at random.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, U01-CA274576. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study does not meet the criteria for human subject research according to the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pennsylvania, since it involves only secondary analysis of de-identified data from an existing database and does not involve new data collection.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe real data analyzed in this article were provided by the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry and restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Request for access to the data should be submitted to and approved by the Georgia Coverdell Acute Stroke Registry.