RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2024.09.12.24313556 DO 10.1101/2024.09.12.24313556 A1 Asgari, Elham A1 MontaƱa-Brown, Nina A1 Dubois, Magda A1 Khalil, Saleh A1 Balloch, Jasmine A1 Pimenta, Dominic YR 2024 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/13/2024.09.12.24313556.abstract AB The integration of large language models (LLMs) into healthcare settings holds great promise for improving clinical workflow efficiency and enhancing patient care, with the potential to automate tasks such as text summarisation during consultations. The fidelity between LLM outputs and ground truth information is therefore paramount in healthcare, as errors in medical summary generation can lead to miscommunication between patients and clinicians, leading to incorrect diagnosis and treatment decisions and compromising patient safety. LLMs are well-known to produce a variety of errors. Currently, there is no established clinical framework for assessing the safety and accuracy of LLM-generated medical text.We have developed a new approach to: a) categorise LLM errors within the clinical documentation context, b) establish clinical safety metrics for the live usage phase, and c) suggest a framework named CREOLA for assessing the safety risk for errors. We present clinical error metrics over 18 different LLM experimental configurations for the clinical note generation task, consisting of 12,999 clinician-annotated sentences. We illustrate the utility of using our platform CREOLA for iteration over LLM architectures with two experiments. Overall, we find our best- performing experiments outperform previously reported model error rates in the note generation literature, and additionally outperform human annotators. Our suggested framework can be used to assess the accuracy and safety of LLM output in the clinical context.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript https://github.com/babylonhealth/primock57