RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Industry differences in managers’ experiences of work capacity in employees with common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study on the Swedish labour market JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2024.09.06.24313226 DO 10.1101/2024.09.06.24313226 A1 Björk, Lisa A1 Hultquist, Jenny A1 Hensing, Gunnel A1 Bertilsson, Monica YR 2024 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2024/09/07/2024.09.06.24313226.abstract AB The aim of this study was to assess industry differences in managers’ experiences and ratings of work capacity in employees with common mental disorders (CMDs). Swedish managers (N=1819) were grouped into three industry classifications. Differences between industries in managers’ experiences were investigated by chi-squared tests. The managers’ ratings of how work capacity was affected by CMDs were analysed using MANCOVA, adjusted for organizational size and managers’ span of control. The proportion of managers who had experienced several employees with CMDs was higher in municipalities and counties, and in pink-collar work, education, health and social care settings compared with other industries. There was no significant effect of industry on managers’ ratings of how work capacity may be affected by CMDs. Contrary to assumptions, there were no differences in how managers perceived capacity to work between industries. Therefore, it is more urgent that managers receive the support they need to handle employees with reduced work capacity due to CMDs rather than to tailor such support to different industries.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementYesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.Not ApplicableThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The project was approved by the Regional Ethics Review Board in Gothenburg (Dnr: 165-17). Written consent to participate were provided by all informants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.Not ApplicableI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Not ApplicableThe data used for this study are archived at the Laboratory of Opinion Research (LORE) at the University of Gothenburg and can be obtained by contacting LORE at info{at}medborgarpanelen.gu.se