PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Dietrich W. Hellen
AU  - Michael Teusner
TI  - Two New Improved Methods for Determination of Cobb’s Angle of Scoliosis
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.11.20124735
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.11.20124735
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/16/2020.06.11.20124735.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/16/2020.06.11.20124735.full
AB  - Cobb’s traditional method for measuring the angle of scoliosis is complicated and error-prone in application. Angles measured with this method are inaccurate and it therefore stands to reason to search for improved procedures.We propose Cobb’s angle to be determined by two novel methods: the distance method and the two-angle method. Using mathematical error analysis and experimental test measurings we demonstrate that the two proposed methods offer significant advantages over the current standard. They simplify the measurement process and increase outcome accuracy.For Cobb’s angles larger than 30 degrees, the two-angle method reduces the error-variation by approx. 25%. For Cobb’s angles below 30 degrees the distance method reduces the error-variation by approx. 50%.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Experimental measurings with students were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the oversight body.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are included in the manuscript.