RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Synchronised inflations generate greater gravity dependent lung ventilation in neonates
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.12.20129379
DO 10.1101/2020.06.12.20129379
A1 Dowse, G
A1 Perkins, E
A1 Thomson, J
A1 Schinckel, N
A1 Pereira-Fantini, PM
A1 Tingay, DG
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/13/2020.06.12.20129379.abstract
AB Background Synchronising positive pressure inflations with an infant’s own breathing is considered lung protective, but the ventilation patterns within the intubated infant lung during synchronous and asynchronous inflations are unknown.Objective To describe the regional distribution patterns of tidal ventilation within the lung during mechanical ventilation that is synchronous or asynchronous with an infant’s own breathing effort.Methods Intubated infants receiving synchronised mechanical ventilation at The Royal Children’s Hospital NICU were studied. During four 10-minute periods of routine care, regional distribution of tidal volume (VT; Electrical Impedance Tomography), delivered pressure and airway flow (Florian Respiratory Monitor) were measured for every inflation. Post hoc, each inflation was then classified as synchronous or asynchronous from video data of the ventilator screen, and the distribution of absolute VT and delivered ventilation characteristics determined.Results 2749 inflations (2462 synchronous) were analysed in 19 infants; mean (SD) age 28 (30) day, GA 35 (5) weeks. Synchronous inflations were associated with a shorter respiratory cycle (p=0.004) and more homogenous VT (centre of ventilation) along the right (0%) to left (100%) lung plane; 45.3 (8.6)% vs 48.8 (9.4)% (uniform ventilation 46%). The gravity dependent centre of ventilation was a mean (95% CI) 2.1 (−0.5, 4.6)% more towards the dependent lung during synchronous inflations. Tidal ventilation relative to anatomical lung size was more homogenous during synchronised inflations in the dependent lung.Conclusion Synchronous mechanical ventilator lung inflations generate more gravity dependent lung ventilation and more uniform right to left ventilation than asynchronous inflations.What is the key question?To determine the contribution of spontaneous effort synchronised with positive inflation pressures on ventilation patterns within the neonatal lung.What is the bottom line?Synchronous lung inflations generate greater homogeneity of ventilation within the right and left lungs, and greater ventilation in the gravity dependent lung ventilation than asynchronous inflations.Why read on?Understanding the complex interactions occurring within the lung between mechanical and spontaneous inflations provides insights into the potential for lung protection and injury.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is supported by the Victorian Government Operational Infrastructure Support Program (Melbourne, Australia). GD and NS received an MCRI Honours student scholarship. DGT is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Career Development Fellowship (Grant ID 1053889). SenTec AG (Landquart, Switzerland) manufactured custom-built EIT belts for infants. All EIT hardware was purchased by MCRI without any restrictions.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Royal Children's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 36159A)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDeidentified individual participant data, study protocols and statistical analysis codes are available from three months to 23 years following article publication to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, with approval by an independent review committee (learned intermediary). Proposals should be directed to david.tingay@mcri.edu.au to gain access. Data requestors will need to sign a data access or material transfer agreement approved by MCRI.