RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Lack of sufficient public space can limit the effectiveness of COVID-19’s social distancing measures
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.06.07.20124982
DO 10.1101/2020.06.07.20124982
A1 Alexandre Nobajas
A1 Joan Ganau i Casas
A1 Daniel Paül i Agustí
A1 Adam Peacock
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/14/2020.06.07.20124982.abstract
AB One of the primary strategies of slowing down the COVID-19 pandemic has been the establishment of social distancing rules that recommend keeping a buffer distance between individuals, and this has proven effective in helping in reducing the basic reproduction number [R 0]1. However, social distancing rules have put the use of public spaces in densely populated places under strain, and this is especially important as some of the most virulent outbreaks of the COVID-19 pandemic have been in compact cities. It is therefore fundamental to take into account each neighbourhood’s morphological characteristics and the potential population densities each street, square or park can accommodate under such new regulations in order to effectively enforce social distancing rules. Otherwise, certain areas may be rapidly overwhelmed by crowds with citizens unable to maintain the minimum safe distance between individuals. In this paper, we develop a method to identify the potential public space accessibility if social distancing rules are followed and we apply it to three global and highly affected by COVID-19 cities. Our research finds that, at micro level there are important inequalities between neighbourhoods, so people will struggle to comply with social distancing rules and consequently it will make controlling infection rates more difficult.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Data utilized was from publicly available sources with no individual level identifiers. The authors self-exempted the data as not qualifying as human subjects research requiring IRB oversight.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is freely available online and all links are included as part of the manuscript https://opendata-ajuntament.barcelona.cat/data/ca/dataset/mapa-usos-sol-wms https://datos.madrid.es/portal/site/egob/menuitem.c05c1f754a33a9fbe4b2e4b284f1a5a0/?vgnextoid=81f9a6cb58f1c510VgnVCM2000001f4a900aRCRD&vgnextchannel=374512b9ace9f310VgnVCM100000171f5a0aRCRD&vgnextfmt=default https://centrodedescargas.cnig.es/CentroDescargas/index.jsp# https://www.ine.es/censos2011_datos/cartografia_censo2011_nacional.zip https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/2010/geo/tiger-data.html https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/zip/data-maps/open-data/nyc_mappluto_20v3_unclipped_shp.zip